User talk:tomchen1989/Archive2011
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Tomchen1989. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Orphaned non-free image File:Nirvana logo.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Nirvana logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:56, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Since I accidentally hit enter before completing my edit summary: just adding the image means nothing if the article doesn't justify its presence (even mere background helps) igordebraga ≠ 14:11, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Nirvana logo.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Nirvana logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:03, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Request for Comment
I am contacting you because of a minor formatting edit here, which refreshed my memory about who you are. Please share your opinion at Talk:Military Demarcation Line#Request for Comment. What do you think? --Tenmei (talk) 18:01, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Taobao.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Taobao.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. – Adrignola talk 15:54, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Template:Copied multi/doc
Hi. Could you explain this edit at Template:Copied multi/doc? {{Merged-to}} means that the associated page is a redirect, but its talk page should be tagged to prevent accidental deletion. Flatscan (talk) 04:34, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Infobox country
Can you adjust the new language fields so they appear immediately after official languages rather than regional languages? It's far more useful there as it can clarify other official usages, however currently if there are any regional languages it edits those instead. Cheers, Chipmunkdavis (talk) 17:25, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
See China for example. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 12:03, 20 November 2011 (UTC)