User talk:tomchen1989/Archive2010
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Tomchen1989. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome to Wikipedia!
|
Airplaneman ✈ 03:01, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Xtreme Mod
Hi, could you plz respond on the Xtreme Mod talk page? mfg, OldDeath (talk) 17:41, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
- May I request the same thing again? ;)
- BTW, are you part of the user/contributor community of an eD2k client project?
- mfg, OldDeath - 14:21, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
- Hey, I've just seen that you are the only real contributor to the Chinese article for Shareaza and I'd like to thank you for that, even if I can't read/understand it. ;)
ww2 template
Hi, It was discussed ages ago either on the WW2 taskforce page or the MILHIST talk page that the template was superceded by the WW2 portal. Regards EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 16:58, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of China National Highway 110 traffic jam for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article China National Highway 110 traffic jam, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China National Highway 110 traffic jam (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Strange Passerby (talk • c • status) 16:25, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
IMO, this map is very helpful; and I have added it to each of several related articles.
IMO, it would be improved if only three islands were specifically identified — 1 + 2 + 3.
If you see my point, I wonder if you might decide to upload an alternate version?
I don't question that there may be one or more articles where so many identified areas are necessary, but I do question whether this degree of specificity is a good thing for the following:
|
I don't know whether I'm asking you to do something difficult or easy. I hope you can tell me that it's very easily accomplished. --Tenmei (talk) 01:37, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:New York Times WikiLeaks.png
A tag has been placed on File:New York Times WikiLeaks.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. wackywace 19:33, 30 November 2010 (UTC)