User talk:Tomcat7/2015/July

Proposed deletion of Anna Blinkova

The article Anna Blinkova has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This player is not notable by project standards; she has no Fed Cup or WTA main draw appearances, has not won any ITF tournaments above the $25,000 category, had no remarkable junior career (neither a Grand Slam champion nor ranked within the world's top 3), and there are no further claims that she is otherwise, at present, generally notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jared Preston (talk) 08:38, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anna Kalinskaya

The article Anna Kalinskaya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This player is not notable by project standards; she has no Fed Cup or WTA main draw appearances, has not won any ITF tournaments above the $25,000 category, had no remarkable junior career (neither a Grand Slam champion nor ranked within the world's top 3), and there are no further claims that she is otherwise, at present, generally notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jared Preston (talk) 08:40, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 15 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the 2015 WTA Finals page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Simeon of Verkhoturye

I have begun reading the article Simeon of Verkhoturye. I noticed "patron saint of the Ural" at the beginning of the lead. Usually, in English, when used alone, "Ural" is a plural noun – "the Urals" – meaning "the Ural Mountains", and "Ural" would be the adjective form, normally preceding a noun (such as "mountains"). Since I'm always open to learning something new, I clicked on the link at "Ural" and found that it led to a disambiguation page. You need to look at that page and select the right article, then create the correct link. Let me know if you need any help. (If you wish, you can write a link so that the correct article title appears first within the square brackets, and then what you really want to appear in the article you put after a pipe, then add the closing square brackets.)

I'll probably have other questions or comments and will add them here. CorinneSD (talk) 00:24, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

A Dramatic Turn of Events

Hello sir. About two and a half years ago, you reviewed A Dramatic Turn of Events for GA status. At the time, I was too busy to make the necessary revisions for it be accepted, but have finally found a little time and think the article is in much better shape now. If you have time, would you mind taking another look? Thanks!Ktmartell (talk) 20:03, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

The article failed the GA last time due to the source problems, now at first glance it looks good. You may want to ask someone who has some knowledge about this subject.--Orel787 (talk) 10:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)