User talk:Tom noll

License tagging for Image:CSS Studio.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CSS Studio.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:05, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Holy Hill

According to the Erin, Wisconsin town website, Holy Hill is located in Erin, Wisconsin. Also 2 Wisconsin county atlases put Holy Hill in Erin, Wisconsin.Thank you-RFD 18:22, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your image of Holy Hill is currently featured on the main page representing the shrine. The article is listed in the Did You Know section for the best new articles. It is considered a new expansion because I expanded it from a 4 sentence stub to a decent-sized article. Another contributor liked the image so much that he requested that your image be displayed on the main page! Nice snap! Royalbroil 15:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:CSS NewStudio.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:CSS NewStudio.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Baron Larf 06:33, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as spamming external links, are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Wafulz 19:54, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page by adding commercial external links, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wafulz 19:58, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for reinserting images which have been removed because of legal and fair use concerns. Your actions can be seen as vandalism. --Baron Larf 01:55, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Example requests for permission for what needs to be done in order for copyrighted images to be used. Cheers --Baron Larf 19:36, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:CSS_building.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CSS_building.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:21, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cathedral of St. Helena

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cathedral of St. Helena, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.sthelenas.org/history.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:12, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Leptat glass

A tag has been placed on Leptat glass, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 19:24, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Bernard O. Gruenke Sr.

A tag has been placed on Bernard O. Gruenke Sr. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 19:21, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spam

I assume that you work for Conrad Schmitt Studios so we will be watching you closely for spam. However the only spammy thing about the Leptat glass article seemed to be the ® symbol - which we do not need in Wikipedia. So I have rescued it from speedy deletion. However if you want to demonstrate that you are not a spammer, you will: start the glass engraving article, include in it a note about Leptat glass and turn Leptat glass into a redirect. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 23:19, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Slab glass

Please find me a written or online citation that the Christ Pantocrator window recently added to the Stained glass page really is the first one in the US. Amandajm (talk) 05:02, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your question

Thank you for your message - I deleted the page because it did not assert the importance of the subject - that's to say that it failed the criteria at WP:CSD. If you disagree then I will happily review my decision, or alternatively you can ask for it to be reviewed by other administrators at WP:Deletion review. Feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. _GB^T/C 23:02, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Guilded Leptat.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Hi Tom noll!
We thank you for uploading Image:Guilded Leptat.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 17:30, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Christ on rainbow.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Hi Tom noll!
We thank you for uploading Image:Christ on rainbow.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 17:59, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Heidi Gruenke Emery

A tag has been placed on Heidi Gruenke Emery requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Evan ¤ Seeds 13:23, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Bernard E. Gruenke

A tag has been placed on Bernard E. Gruenke requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 07:12, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stained Glass Association of America

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Stained Glass Association of America, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Association with no assertion of notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 12:40, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Dedication Mass.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Dedication Mass.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:03, 9 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 07:03, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Addition to Hardman page

Your edit has been deleted. The heading reads Early 19th century English firms (ie Hardman's early competitors). The name that you added was neither early 19th century or English. An understanding of a late 19th century US firm throws no light on the subject of Hardman and Co, and is not a useful link (out of the hundreds of links possible. Amandajm (talk) 10:18, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Stained glass, you will be blocked from editing. CliffC (talk) 17:02, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple consecutive edits, edit summaries

Hello Tom- I'd like to make a couple suggestions, if you don't mind. It will be easier for you and your co-editors to collaborate on articles if, instead of making multiple consecutive edits a minute or two apart on an article, you use the "Show preview" button to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits. It also helps if you provide an edit summary. Thanks in advance for considering this.

Help:Edit_summary promotes providing an edit summary when you make changes.
Help:Show_preview promotes minimizing the number of saves per edit session. Eric ^talk 17:49, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Luigi Gregori

A tag has been placed on Luigi Gregori requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Merlion 444 14:12, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good job

Thank you for adding the post-restoration images to the Holy Hill National Shrine of Mary, Help of Christians article. They are excellent! I'll have to go there to see the changes in person. Your pictures complement my pictures taken before the restoration. Too bad my old camera didn't have that same high quality that your camera does! Royal broil 01:26, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Tom noll! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 248 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

B. Gunar Gruenke - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:44, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Leptat door.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Leptat door.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:20, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Leptat window.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Leptat window.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:01, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:ConradNotreDame.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:05, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spam at Conrad Schmitt Studios

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Conrad Schmitt Studios. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. 32.218.46.214 (talk) 21:01, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Adrian Wewer. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hirolovesswords (talk) 16:49, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]