User talk:TomS TDotO

Welcome!

Hello, TomS TDotO, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! RJFJR 20:33, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

God of the gaps

Thanks for your excellent work in tracking down those most important of primary sources on the subject of the God of the gaps, and sharing them. Apparently you already know it's a subject that has gained increasingly wide relevance today (what with "intelligent design", "theistic evolution", "artificial life", "panentheism", and a host of other meeting places at the borders of traditional theism). Good regards. ... Kenosis 16:06, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ray's Hell Burger

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ray's Hell Burger, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray's Hell Burger. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. City of Destruction (The Celestial City) 23:48, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Myth of the flat earth

Well actually you're wrong, Tom.

There isn't a single statement throughout the article of "modern misconception that the prevailing cosmological view" was of a flat earth. The Russell quotes from Irving don't go that far: one portrayal of an ecclesiastical gentleman wittering about the hide of the sky doesn't amount to much and so many of Russell's statements are demonstrably wrong. e.g. it's obvious that what is in Isidore's Etymology is essentially no different from what Anaximander was saying a thousand years before - and he even pinched the map design from him. He's certainly heard of more modern views - but he doesn't accept them.

There is a single account of American Pageant which possibly is responsible for some the misconception - but it says nothing about "prevailing views" only about a few sailors - and where did it get its ideas from? Not the quoted sources. And when did it appear and when was it pulled from that text?

The genuine flat-earthers such as Rowbotham and Kruger don't get a mention. Why? Because almost to a person they were fundamentalist Christians, still are. And as for all the jokes and films - positively puerile! And since Rowbotham's first book was in 1849, Russell's idea that it was all a reaction to the evolution debate is questionable.

I won't reinstate the second statement. I put it in in despair to see if any of the creationists would notice. And since it ignores Pliny it's not even totally correct. But I really would like to see some evidence. It seems like it's a classic urban legend that is being used to promote singularly uninformed views. (I'll put your talk on my watchlist.) Chris55 (talk) 12:29, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Young Earth creationism

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page.

I'm trying to make (what appear to me to be) uncontroversial changes to Young Earth creationism, but immediately got them reverted with the charge of being "religiously motivated", which I think is unwarranted. I've tried to enter into a discussion about the nature of the changes, but somehow or other the reverter and I don't seem to be able to communicate. With the exception of one small comment, no one else seems to be at all interested. I've tried, most recently, dipping a toe in the water to make the changes one at a time, with no reaction at all to those changes after waiting a few days. I was about to go ahead with the changes as I see fit, when I see that Talk:Young Earth creationism got tagged with a warning about possible sanctions. I don't know who or what the warning is about. What am I to do? TomS TDotO (talk) 17:12, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About the sanction tag, where was this? If you're referring to the tag at the top of Talk:Young Earth creationism, that isn't specifically directed at you, but is a general notice to all editors that edits to that page are treated with an added level of scrutiny and that admins may be a little more ruthless in taking action against editors that cause problems. As for the content dispute you are involved in, you may wish to request a third opinion from a neutral party. If that doesn't help, there are other dispute resolution processes, but I don't expect they'll be necessary in this case. AJ Cham 22:30, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Leonardo da Vinci

I notice that you added another book to the bibliography. People keep adding every book they come across. I am in a quandry as to what to do about this. On one hand, a book may provide a student with valuable information, but on the other hand if I didn't use that book in writing the article, then I can't really cite it. Amandajm (talk) 12:15, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shape of the Earth Merger Discussion

Your comments are welcome at the discussion of the merger proposals involving Flat Earth, Spherical Earth, and Shape of the Earth. --SteveMcCluskey (talk) 21:22, 5 September 2010 (UTC) {{Wikiproject Young Earth Creationism invite}}[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Switch Witch

~~Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Switch Witch, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.~~

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JDDJS (talk) 22:23, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I now that it's not a hoax, it's just not notable. JDDJS (talk) 01:44, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Switch Witch

The article Switch Witch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not Notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JDDJS (talk) 23:39, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Laccognathus embryi

On 21 September 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Laccognathus embryi, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the extinct lobe-finned fish Laccognathus embryi (reconstruction pictured) had fangs up to 3.8 cm (1.5 in) long? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Laccognathus embryi.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 16:03, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Evolution Natural Selection

Please tell me why u have reverted changes to the sections i have edited- i have complete knowledge of the subject and i am working towards a biology degree in university — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.38.136.79 (talk) 13:36, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Message for you at Talk Torah

i took out the words "possible" exception to Moses writing the last 8 verses and explained why Learned69 (talk) 01:43, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I responded to your commnents at talk Torah Learned69 (talk) 00:25, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request Evolution

My reply was not answered on the talk page of evolution and I was hoping you would. Do you care to? --173.66.184.34 (talk) 18:09, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quadrotor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chord (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 21:35, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Evolutionary fauna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Articulata (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mesozoic–Cenozoic Radiation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Decapod (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:19, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mad scene may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

wqxr.org/#!/blogs/operavore/2012/jan/25/top-10-mad-scenes-opera/ The Top 10 Mad Scenes in Opera]] WQXR Operavore retrieved 13-08-13

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:19, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Intelligent design

Hi, thanks for you edit on Intelligent design. You may have noticed that I have started a thread because of your edit, but not intended to be a criticism of it as such, more a request for consideration of a bigger issue. I was in any case wondering what else the latest OED definition gives.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 12:31, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you could mail me snippets rather than "publishing" it online here?--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 15:48, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks but I think that is the bit you already quoted. It implies that there is another meaning which is not chief?--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 17:07, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is only one entry given under "Intelligent design", which is: "Deliberate design in the natural or physical world, attributed to an intelligent entity (usually identified as God); the appearance of this. In later use (freq. with capital initials): a theory which posits this. Cf. design n. 5." The paragraph which I quoted is an expansion on this, in smaller print. TomS TDotO (talk) 17:13, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CN tag on Aristotle article

Hi, concerning this tag, the citation looks complete, so if there is something insufficient perhaps you can give more details of what the concern is?--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 07:47, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited English numerals, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Trey and Deuce (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Agni pran

The article Agni pran has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, unable to establish notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 13:08, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your ID comment

In that most recent comment, I suspect you meant your first use of "astronomy" to say "astrology". HiLo48 (talk) 00:43, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hendiadys

added links pointing to Come Get It and Come and get it

English possessive

added a link pointing to Friend of Mine

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Apophenia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interpretation of dreams. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

S&P 500 Milestone

I'm sorry for my clumsy edit, Tom. I only meant to point out that it HAS in fact closed well above 2000. 2063 in fact. Therefore the sentence "It has to close well above 2000..." is out of date. I was going to fill in the details if someone else had not. tharsaile (talk) 01:40, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Absent referent, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Differential. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Primeval history, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Genesis and Enoch. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Book of Exodus may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

of the text]]: "These are the names of the sons of Israel" {{lang-he-n|ואלה שמות בני ישראל}})), is the second book of the [[Torah]] and the [[Hebrew Bible]] (the [[Old Testament]]).<ref>Dozeman,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:38, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, TomS TDotO. You have new messages at Talk:Griffin Television Tower Oklahoma.
Message added 12:32, 23 February 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dcheagle • talk • contribs 12:32, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Artamène, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pliny. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Book of Genesis

Surely you meant tenth century not eleventh, as Solomon says? Doug Weller talk 11:43, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Pages

I don't know how to merge pages, could you please help? The articles, supernatural and paranormal are the same thing and should be merged to one article. Tel yari (talk) 22:47, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aleiodes gaga for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aleiodes gaga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleiodes gaga until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 11:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

E. coli long term evolution experiment

TomS, thank you for reminding us of the WP:RS guideline. There's an ongoing discussion on the exact topic you blank-reverted; some of the details still belong to the page, I believe. Feel free to join in in the discussion, a fresh input is always welcome. 87.6.135.76 (talk) 12:03, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi TomS TDotO. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:40, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-canonical books referenced in the Bible

Removed again. "Source needed". Please cite? Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 07:58, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, TomS TDotO. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, TomS TDotO!

Wikipedia editor Ramaksoud2000 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia!

To reply, leave a comment on Ramaksoud2000's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, TomS TDotO. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, TomS TDotO. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of anonymously published works, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Chambers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:STUB

Hi,

An article you recently created, Table of the House, does not have source. Sizable articles are usually not considered stubs, even if they have significant problems or are noticeably incomplete. If a stub has little verifiable information, or if its subject has no apparent notability, it may be deleted or be merged into another relevant article. Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 11:12, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Table of the House moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Table of the House, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Britishfinance (talk) 13:57, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Inert Gas 541 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Inert Gas 541, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Inert Gas 541

Hello, TomS TDotO. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Inert Gas 541".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 16:41, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Table of the House concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Table of the House, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hornbeck, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inherit the Wind (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:35, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Table of the House

Hello, TomS TDotO. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Table of the House".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! --TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 17:57, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michael C. Marshall (science writer)

The article Michael C. Marshall (science writer) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. TheMrP (talk) 15:57, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Michael C. Marshall (science writer) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Michael C. Marshall (science writer), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 01:50, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Coppelia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Olympia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accidental revert?

With this edit you reinstated a large number of MOS:OVERLINKs. Could I ask you to reconsider? Favonian (talk) 23:53, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't wait forever and another editor partially reverted you, so I completed it. The case may hopefully be considered closed. Favonian (talk) 00:12, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heliacal rising, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Morning Star.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Michael C. Marshall (science writer)

Hello, TomS TDotO. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Michael C. Marshall (science writer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:03, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Genitive case, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orion.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Michael C. Marshall (science writer)

Hello, TomS TDotO. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Michael C. Marshall".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:53, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Version of the bible" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Version of the bible and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 26#Version of the bible until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 14:16, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chuthral

Hello, TomS TDotO. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chuthral, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:15, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chuthral

Hello, TomS TDotO. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chuthral".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:37, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]