User talk:TomMMYway.sixtime

April 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Indigo (Chris Brown album), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources.

Additionally, the cites provided do not associate with the content added. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 15:54, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Indigo (Chris Brown album) while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 21:56, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Levi High, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you.

CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 13:55, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New articles

Hi, you should have created Haute (Tyga) at Haute (song) and Easy (Remix) at Easy (DaniLeigh song). They were previously created as redirects, so it is perfectly acceptable to create articles from them. Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 00:21, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Restroom Occupied.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Restroom Occupied.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:43, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Make it Haute.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Make it Haute.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:39, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:EasyChrisBrown.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:EasyChrisBrown.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:40, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:BloMaMaind.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:BloMaMaind.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:40, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Restroom Occupied.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Restroom Occupied.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:41, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Lost & Found (Chris Brown song). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You have been making up your own reviews of songs, then adding a small fact from a cited source to make it all seem legitimate, which it is not. You have also been editing logged out in the IP range Special:Contributions/5.171.215.0/21, doing the same problematic violations of the original research policy. You also attacked another editor here. Binksternet (talk) 15:02, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Heartbreak on a Full Moon. Block evasion by User:Giubbotto non ortodosso. Binksternet (talk) 23:34, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Giubbotto non ortodosso (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Make it Haute.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Make it Haute.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Blow My Mind (Davido and Chris Brown song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blow My Mind (Davido and Chris Brown song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blow My Mind (Davido and Chris Brown song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

versacespace talk to me 03:24, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]