User talk:Tokyo2001

Estonian SSR as place of birth

Hi, I guarantee you that these are all but three articles in Wikipedia, where the place of birth is shown as "Estonian SSR". These people were born in Estonia, which was recognized by most world governments. You are clearly not seeing that 99.99% of people born in Estonia in that era do not have the "Estonian SSR" in their birthplace. I will undo your edits soon if you don't provide an answer. H2ppyme (talk) 16:39, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please, either start communicating or stop editing. --Sander Säde 08:03, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Your recent editing history at Anton Vaino shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 18:46, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Tokyo2001_reported_by_User:Estlandia_.28Result:_.29

I have reported you for edit warring. Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 21:42, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring at multiple articles and POV-pushing based on a report at WP:AN3. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 23:17, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tokyo2001 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

His statement is not true. There is no consensus. see Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive170 (Leo Komarov), Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive170

Decline reason:

First, it took a while to find where this block was discussed. Second, you had at least seven hours or so to respond and discuss this and you chose not to. So it shouldn't surprise you that it ends up like this. — Daniel Case (talk) 02:14, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for block evasion to continue the edit war on multiple articles. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:03, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You broke 3RR rule yet again. Please, just finally stop your nonsensical edit warring and discuss your actions. Sander Säde 08:04, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked from editing

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for your disruption caused by edit warring and pushing a particular point of view at Toivo Suursoo. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:42, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for Edit warring: / disruptive editing on Jaanus Sorokin. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—slakr^\ talk / 18:49, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]