User talk:FastApproachingDoom
TobiisNOTmadara1291, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]
|
Hi TobiisNOTmadara1291! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| For your outstanding work at the List of landmark court decisions in the United States page. P3Y229 (talk • contribs) 00:07, 19 February 2014 (UTC) |
Conflict resolution
[edit]Please read the dialogue below and respond at my Talk Page (at this link: User talk:Joseph A. Spadaro ). Thank you. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 22:16, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Request for administrator help
[edit] | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
I'd like to request the assistance of an administrator. Thank you. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 00:15, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Please include your request when you use {{adminhelp}}. Mkdwtalk 03:38, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hi. Are you an admin? Can you assist me, please? Let me know. Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 04:28, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, how can I help? Mkdwtalk 04:34, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hi. Are you an admin? Can you assist me, please? Let me know. Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 04:28, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'd like to know if you can intervene or advise. This matter concerns another editor here on Wikipedia. I believe that he must be "new" because he has a red link user name. If I am reading his edit contributions history correctly, he only started on Wikipedia about a month ago (January 16, 2014). I also noticed that an inordinate number of his edits are him reverting other people. His User Name is User:TobiisNOTmadara1291. In any event, there is a series of 4 or 5 articles (about the death penalty). They are all formatted the same exact way, in a consistent manner. And they have been that way for many years. On one article (or perhaps 2), he went in and changed the formatting. So, he changed the format; I changed it back. He changed it; I changed it back. Etc. I never kept count, but it is probably 2 or 3 reverts so far. I don't want any hassles, so I am hoping some disinterested party can step in. I am sure you can look at the Edit Histories; you can see the edits; you can see the edit summaries. By the way, these are articles with very little editing done, so all of the edits I am referring to should be way at the top of the history. He made the last edits, reverting mine. I didn't want to go in and violate some "three revert rule" or what have you. So, I didn't revert him. Rather, I posted this Admin Help Request. These articles have been around for years; and the format has stayed the same for years. Until he came along. The articles in question are: List of offenders executed in the United States in 2013 and List of offenders executed in the United States in 2014. There are other articles in the series, but I think he has not edited them yet (I believe). What do you suggest? Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 04:50, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Joseph A. Spadaro, you're a very experienced editor here on Wikipedia. Even more than I. I would like to see you make an attempt to talk it out with this editor on a talk page before a third party becomes involved. If the fruits of those discussions are bare then please let me know, otherwise, User talk:TobiisNOTmadara1291 would probably be a good place to talk about how best to move forward. Mkdwtalk 16:31, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'd like to know if you can intervene or advise. This matter concerns another editor here on Wikipedia. I believe that he must be "new" because he has a red link user name. If I am reading his edit contributions history correctly, he only started on Wikipedia about a month ago (January 16, 2014). I also noticed that an inordinate number of his edits are him reverting other people. His User Name is User:TobiisNOTmadara1291. In any event, there is a series of 4 or 5 articles (about the death penalty). They are all formatted the same exact way, in a consistent manner. And they have been that way for many years. On one article (or perhaps 2), he went in and changed the formatting. So, he changed the format; I changed it back. He changed it; I changed it back. Etc. I never kept count, but it is probably 2 or 3 reverts so far. I don't want any hassles, so I am hoping some disinterested party can step in. I am sure you can look at the Edit Histories; you can see the edits; you can see the edit summaries. By the way, these are articles with very little editing done, so all of the edits I am referring to should be way at the top of the history. He made the last edits, reverting mine. I didn't want to go in and violate some "three revert rule" or what have you. So, I didn't revert him. Rather, I posted this Admin Help Request. These articles have been around for years; and the format has stayed the same for years. Until he came along. The articles in question are: List of offenders executed in the United States in 2013 and List of offenders executed in the United States in 2014. There are other articles in the series, but I think he has not edited them yet (I believe). What do you suggest? Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 04:50, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Requested participation
[edit]Your participation is requested at Talk:List of offenders executed in the United States in 2013#Formatting. Thank you, Mkdwtalk 16:45, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Your edits to 2013 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
[edit]Re: my reversion of your incorrect edits, see http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinions.aspx for the actual case names, and the opinions themselves for the proper way to refer to the respective parties. postdlf (talk) 23:41, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
[edit]
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 00:33, 4 April 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, TobiisNOTmadara1291. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, TobiisNOTmadara1291. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, TobiisNOTmadara1291. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
2020 List of landmark court decisions in the United States clean up
[edit]You added the "Fixing This Article" section at the List of landmark court decisions in the United States talk page at April 18, 2020. I responded to it. Can you please add your answers and thoughts to my questions and proposals? Thanks in advance. --P3Y229 (talk • contribs) 15:09, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)