User talk:Tobias123 2

October 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bohemian Rhapsody have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bohemian Rhapsody was changed by Tobias123 2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.877113 on 2023-10-15T00:04:15+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:04, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Teo Torriatte (Let Us Cling Together). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Teo Torriatte (Let Us Cling Together) was changed by Tobias123 2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2023-10-15T00:29:28+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Seawolf35 (talk) 03:04, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's rubbish Tobias123 2 (talk) 03:05, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Death On Two Legs

Hey I notice you updated Death on Two legs page and made it a single. Anyways I want to ask do you have any sort of proof that it is a single? Lemme answer that for you no! If you look on the official Queen website which I will link here https://www.queenonline.com/music . You can see that Death On Two Legs were not released as a single instead it was included in Queen First E.P. so please stop saying Death On Two Legs is a single. You have been misinform. If you are saying that the fandom page has solid proof like the single cover, I want to say that the single cover looks unpolished and unprofessional. It would never be from a Queen Production. Especially since they are perfectionist. They wouldn't let such poorly put together stuff get released. So again stop saying Death on two legs is a single. 219.78.68.59 (talk) 01:46, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also '39 is neither a single on its own nor it is a double A-side with You're my best friend. Stop making it a single. 219.78.68.59 (talk) 01:57, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I like how you keep telling everyone Lily of The Valley is not a single yet never go check whether Death On Two Legs was a single. 219.78.68.59 (talk) 01:59, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And even say She Makes Me (Stormtrooper in Stilettos) is a single. Where did you get all this information from. I am very curious 219.78.68.59 (talk) 02:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

From the Queen Fandom from earlier this month, remember? Tobias123 2 (talk) 02:36, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wow you would rather trust the fandom and not trust official sites. Come on dude. 219.78.68.59 (talk) 02:44, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That death on two legs single cover doesn't even look like a official release. Come on 219.78.68.59 (talk) 02:46, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you lie? Come on man! Are you Binksternet's ALT account or something? Tobias123 2 (talk) 02:56, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know maybe it is because there is a wiki page specifying content from most wikis is generally unacceptable: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources 219.78.68.59 (talk) 02:59, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rubbish Tobias123 2 (talk) 02:35, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Go look at this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources "Content from websites whose content is largely user-generated is generally unacceptable. Sites with user-generated content include personal websites, personal and group blogs (excluding newspaper and magazine blogs), content farms, Internet forums, social media sites, fansites, video and image hosting services, most wikis and other collaboratively created websites." 219.78.68.59 (talk) 02:51, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You see the most wikis 219.78.68.59 (talk) 02:52, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Get off of Wikipedia, right now! Or I'll block you from editing Tobias123 2 (talk) 03:02, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You do you friend. I give up. You have fun. 219.78.68.59 (talk) 03:07, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is your name Daoud Alkabsh or something? 96.92.224.26 (talk) 01:11, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:27, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]