User talk:Tobeyjaggle

Leave me messages here

Hi, Tobeyjaggle, and welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
To post an image try Wikipedia:Image tutorial, but remember to look out for copyright violations
Stay away from common mistakes
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or on my user talk page
Explore, be bold, and, most importantly, have fun!
Oh, and don't forget to tell something about yourself on your user page!

Good luck! Renata3 20:35, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Stupid "Evidences"

Hey - noticed your comments at Plural Marriage. You stated in your edit summary "no documented occurances of group sex" and changed "Most plural marriages did not involve group sex" to "There are no known occurances of group sex under this practice."

This is true. Somewhat. This depends on you definition of "evidence."

There is evidence of that Young placed a family on the Mormon trail where the husband and two wives slept in the same bed. Whether or not this was done to discourage non-Mormon settlement near Mormon communities or not is a matter of some dispute. As it was a waystation, all pioneering companies had to stop there and likely would witness the set up. This is where the claim of "evidence" comes from. Obviously, one bed, two women and a man, would lead people to believe that sexual relations occured in the bed, which by definition is group sex. Stupid reasoning, but it is enough to provide "evidence" although not very reliable.

I think a more accurate reflection of the statement would be "Mormon plural marriages did not include group sex."

Would you like to make the change? -Visorstuff 23:35, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough - used your correction. --Tobey 04:56, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!!!

Hi Tobeyjaggle,welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you ever need editing help visit Wikipedia:How does one edit a page or how to format them visit our manual of style. Experiment at Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. Becca77^Talk/_Email 15:33, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Good re-write on the Ed Decker article!

Your last edit on the Decker divorce was re-written Wiki style. Good job, Tobeyjaggle. Becca77^Talk/_Email 21:39, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ozumba_temple.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ozumba_temple.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 22:48, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The image was taken by anthropologist Thomas W. Murphy, I'll see what I can do to secure a statement from him that he is happy for the image to be used.

Police questioning.

Hello Tobeyjaggle, I have included you among a list of Wiki users as a candidate for police review. Do not be alarmed if you are contacted. --Renyseneb 09:25, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Police review? Is the Wiki world turning into a police state? (This comment was made by User:Tobeyjaggle 01:55, 31 August 2006)

Hello, please sign your posts. --Renyseneb 03:02, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Leslie Broadbent

I don't claim to have any special knowledge of Mormon fundamentalist groups and their history. I was guided by the biography of Joseph Leslie Broadbent on Mormonfundamentalism.com, which is linked in the article. The biography gives a source for the discussion of the succession controversy, but I have not independently consulted that source. As for the spelling of "Yates" or "Yeates", I was again guided by the same source. Other Google sources (here and here) give the "Yates" spelling.

There does appear to have been some kind of succession dispute after Broadbent's death, even if most Mormon fundamentalists were unaware or uninvolved. As for the spelling question, I can only go by the sources I was able to consult. There may be better sources available. Casey Abell 18:13, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The official LDS Church records say Yeats see this [1].

His middle name is after his mother whose maiden name was Yeates, see this [2].

--Tobey 20:12, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mick Ronson

Nice little story about Mick, and, yes, it isn't Encyclopediac or germaine to the article so it has been removed. Insofar that his religion didn't inform what he was famous for - blistering guitar solo's, edgy rhythm guitar, stylish piano playing, great singing, innovative arranging, fantastic producing and all round nice guy - then it is only mentioned briefly in the text. I'm sure there are a few Ronson sites where other fans would be happy to hear of your encounter, though. Cheers.LessHeard vanU 19:28, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]