User talk:To Fight a Vandal/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about User:To Fight a Vandal. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Wrong guy
Undid revision. Undid this 2 look at latin alphabet i did that 216.114.210.66 (talk)
- The edit history shows you adding the false information and then removing it. Sorry, but the proof is in the pudding. --To Fight a Vandal (talk) 14:10, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Irwin Bramson
why did you delete Irwin Bramson article? it was factual info i just hadnt cited the sources yet —Preceding unsigned comment added by JCock15 (talk • contribs) 15:36, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- I did not delete the article. I placed a tag on it so an administrator would know that a user thought it should be deleted. He or she obviously agreed because it has now been deleted. You are free to recreate the article as long as it is notable and you cite your sources. --To Fight a Vandal (talk) 15:46, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Irwin Bramson page
why cant i write an article about Irwin? why do you always delete my article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by JCock15 (talk • contribs) 16:06, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- As I said above, I do not delete your articles. If they are being deleted then it probably means you are writing about nonsense. I simply bring the article to the attention of Wikipedia administrators and they delete the articles. --To Fight a Vandal (talk) 16:09, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
November 2008
Hello. I noticed today that you were doing newpages patrolling but are not marking some of the pages you visit as patrolled. Though this is not mandatory in any way, and should not be done for all newpages, where appropriate it keeps your fellow patrollers from wasting time reviewing the same page multiple times. In any event, keep up the good work! Thanks. Noobaphobia, Matthew Buck (Hack) Omarcheeseboro (talk) 16:30, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, I wasn't aware that the nonsense pages should be marked as patrolled. I will mark them from now on. Thanks for letting me know. --To Fight a Vandal (talk) 16:31, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- No problem, it just helps other "patrollers" know not to click on a page when viewing this Special:NewPages --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 16:35, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Richmond Trophy 1950
Why do you want to delete it? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1950_Richmond_Trophy —Preceding unsigned comment added by Swedol (talk • contribs) 18:20, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- There is no explanation as to what it is. If you add an explanation, perhaps an administrator will decide to keep it. --To Fight a Vandal (talk) 18:24, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
St. Cyprien de Napierville
Hello there, I noticed that you have tagged St. Cyprien de Napierville under CSD. But places are always notable and not sufficient for deletion unless it is a non notable fictional place. The article can be expanded. There are number of sources available in G hits. Thank you--NAHID 18:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- All right. The article just said "It is a small village in Quebec" so I pulled the trigger on it pretty quick.
I'll remove the tag.I see you have added {{hangon}} to it now. --To Fight a Vandal (talk) 18:51, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
re: SafetyEye
Sheesh! She'll hopefully talk to us now I've blocked article re-creation for a bit. --GraemeL (talk) 18:55, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, that article kept coming back, over and over and over! Glad you blocked re-creation. --To Fight a Vandal (talk) 18:56, 6 November 2008 (UTC)