User talk:ToTheCircus

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to United States Senate Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: United States Senate Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs was changed by ToTheCircus (u) (t) deleting 35857 characters on 2008-12-07T05:12:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 05:12, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to United States Senate Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs, you will be blocked from editing. Eeekster (talk) 05:46, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Eeekster, you will be blocked from editing. Eeekster (talk) 00:27, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

There is a discussion about you at WP:ANI#User:ToTheCircus constantly reverting article against complete consensus of other editors. Sandstein 00:23, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Missing in action. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Nick-D (talk) 05:21, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Edit warring. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

at Missing in action. For more details, see the discussion at WP:ANI. If you continue to misuse the word vandalism you may be cited for disruptive editing. EdJohnston (talk) 06:19, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Missing In Action You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. - Nabokov (talk) 00:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning; otherwise I'm blocking you for edit warring, and this time it'll be a week. Please don't go against a clear consensus. Thank you, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :D} 01:41, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]