User talk:Tkenna

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Tkenna, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --BigDT 23:38, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to your message at my talk page

Thank you for your good work you have done so far. To answer your question, yes. Please see Category:User warning templates for a very long list of templates you can use. The short version of it is that if it is simple vandalism, use one of the "test" templates. If it is likely just a test (ie, blanking a section possibly in good faith, saying "can I really create a page", or just hitting buttons), use {{test}} or {{test-n}}. If it is their first offense and obviously vandalism, use {{test2}} or {{test2-n}}. If it is a later offense or blatant vandalism, use {{test3}} or {{test3-n}}. If they have already been warned and it's obvious that they need to either stop or be blocked, use {{test4}} or {{test4-n}}. Once someone has been warned with test3 or test4 and continues to vandalize, they should be reported at WP:AIV so that an administrator can block them. Thanks again for your hard work. BigDT 23:51, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your help. I'll use those in future. One more question, when reverting vandalism, is there any specific thing I need to write in the edit summary, or will 'reverted vandalism' do? Tkenna 23:55, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edit to Bill Goldberg:

Your recent edit to Bill Goldberg (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 00:06, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note - Bot was mistaken Tkenna 18:34, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trolls

No problem. I had a feeling that one wasn't going to go unblocked for long. Cheers, Antandrus (talk) 03:01, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sneaky spammer

Sharp eye! Nice work. If you see more, just remove them. You can add them to the spam blacklist if the same site starts to show up a lot (put suggestions here [1]), and WP:SPAM, as well as the Wikiproject on spam probably have a lot of useful suggestions. WP:AIV works too, if a particular IP is being a problem. Cheers, Antandrus (talk) 16:38, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! — Nearly Headless Nick 17:27, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

oi

this is no joke. wikipedia WILL be hacked, but i am up for negociations. --SomeYearPeriod 15:24, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I refuse to take you seriously. If you continue to vandalise wikipedia I will WP:AIV you. Tkenna 15:26, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, you're a d00d. — Nearly Headless Nick 10:35, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:29, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

w3player

Hello. I understand your concern but the article read more like a post on an Internet forum than like an encyclopedia article. I sincerely doubt that there has been significant third-party coverage on w3player to warrant an article of any reasonable quality. Of course, the article is useful for people who are looking to figure out what w3player is but really Wikipedia is not the place they should be looking for this info. There are many resources out there which can and do offer the kind of technical information which is beyond Wikipedia's mission. Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 02:51, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The readability perplex...

Hello and thanks. I guess it can move... I agree that readability is a key factor, especially on pages with theoretical/technical content where one has to combine technical correctness with comprehensibility to a general readership. I don't think that's an easy thing to do, and it's nice to be able to work together. Best, —MistyMorn (talk) 17:15, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate

Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.

We welcome you to have a look the journal. Like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter. Feel free to participate in the journal.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:

Publish an article to the journal. Even a medical student like you can make a submission.
Sign up as a peer reviewer of potential upcoming articles. If you do not have expertise in these subjects, you can help in finding peer reviewers for current submissions.
Sign up as an editor, and help out in open tasks.
Outreach to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this Contribute-page. Example presentation about the journal.
Add a post-publication review of an existing publication. If errors are found, there are guidelines for editing published works.
Join the editorial board.
Share your ideas of what the journal would be like in the future as separate Wikimedia project.
Donate to Wikimedia Foundation.
Translate journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages
- Ceština, Deutsch, Español, Français, Italiano, 한국어, Português, Slovenšcina, Suomi, Svenska, Ελληνικά, Русский, العربية, 日本語
Technical work like template designing for the journal.
Sign up to get emails related to the journal, which are sent to updateswijoumed.org. If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at haggstrom.mikaelwikiversityjournal.org.
Spread the word to anyone who could be interested or could benefit from it.

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reachwikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

Diptanshu^Talk 06:44, 12 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.[reply]