User talk:Tixienixie
Hello, Tixienixie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. Here are a few important links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia (see especially WP:V)
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:CITE
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- Manual of Style and Writing better articles
- Editing by consensus – working well with other Wikipedians
If you'd like some help with editing, you can sign up at the new users log or ask me on my discussion (talk) page. If you need other help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, post a question at the Help Desk, or ask me.
Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. It is always wise to read the most recent entries at the bottom of the talk page of an existing article before making major changes to it. Before I make a major change to an article, I often make a proposal on the talk page to see if anyone minds.
Again, welcome! -- Ssilvers (talk) 04:39, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
External links
[edit]Hi. I see you've been adding some external links to articles. Please review WP:EL about when such links are appropriate in the encyclopedia articles. Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:57, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
FYI conflict of interest guideline
[edit]If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to verifiability of information, WP:SPAM and use of reliable sources. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. — Ssilvers (talk) 18:41, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.
- Sydenham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link to Ben Brown
- The Music Hall Guild of Great Britain and America (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link to Crystal Palace
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi and thank you for your latest editions on the above article. I can say for sure that Stanley Lupino was buried near to Leno, but have yet to confirm if Mark Lupino was also buried there. It is usual for all claims, devoid of common knowledge, to be evidenced by way of a WP:RELY on Wikipedia. As a main editor for the article, I have chosen to remove your claim pending a reliable source. If you have one then please re add your info and cite with this source. I will of course be looking for one too as I am not a deletionist and only have the article's best intentions at heart. Thanks again. -- Cassianto (talk) 02:12, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
February 2012
[edit]Trixienixie, you have been editing Wikipedia now for over a year, and you have been asked repeatedly to properly source you contributions. When you add new information to Wikipedia, you must add citations to verify the information. Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to verifiability of information, WP:SPAM and use of reliable sources. Unreferenced additions will be deleted. -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:07, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
- I have also noticed this. Please put references and citations to all information added to articles or you run the risk of its being deleted as unsourced. Jack1956 (talk) 15:48, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
- As the original perpetrator of the George Graves article I have it automatically on my watchlist, and I too was perturbed at your addition of (I have absolutely no doubt) excellent and correct material, but we really must have citations for all substantive statements. Tim riley (talk) 15:58, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
- Trixienixie, I support these comments. This, unfortunately, is becoming bit of a habit and one you need to break. References are vital for creating accurate articles, so please put this into practise. Remember, we are here to help not to hinder. -- Cassianto (talk) 20:18, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- As the original perpetrator of the George Graves article I have it automatically on my watchlist, and I too was perturbed at your addition of (I have absolutely no doubt) excellent and correct material, but we really must have citations for all substantive statements. Tim riley (talk) 15:58, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Edmund Payne. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Karl 334 ☞TALK to ME ☜ 18:19, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
March 2012
[edit]At the risk of repeating myself, you have been asked repeatedly to properly source you contributions. When you add new information to Wikipedia, you must add citations to verify the information. Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to verifiability of information, WP:SPAM and use of reliable sources. Unreferenced additions will be deleted. -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Latest additions to Herbert Campbell and Marie Studholme
[edit]Hi, and thanks for your recent edits on the above articles. I note you have now made efforts to reference the information you are adding. This was good but was formatted incorrectly so I have done this for you. On another note, I have read your comments here and wanted to pick up on a point. You state that you are a volunteer working for a charity (presumably The Music Hall Guild of Great Britain and America). If that is the case, can I ask you to please familiarise yourself with WP:SPAM, WP:SOAP, WP:COI and WP:CITE as, although your intensions may be strictly honourable, some could see it as a form of advertising for The Music Hall Guild of Great Britain and America. Don't get me wrong I'm all for this wonderful charity and applaud the good work in which it does, but WP is not to be used as a platform to advertise. All of your edits seem to cheifly employ one source of information - The Music Hall Guild of Great Britain and America - so perhaps you can see why one would think this. -- Cassianto (talk) 14:12, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Points
[edit]Hi, thanks for getting back to me. Please don't apologise, we were all novices once, and I still make mistakes today (quite a lot actually!) I have a big interest in English Music hall myself and contribute quite heavily to Wikipedia on that very subject. In fact I, along with Ssilvers, have just seen Dan Leno through the very tough Featured Article process (which basically means it is now listed as being one of the very best articles WP has to offer). Anyway, enough of this puffery. I applaud you on your contributions and encourage you to carry on. However, it may do you good to combine the use of other sources if you can - together with The Music Hall Guild website - as this will prevent other editors making accusations that you are promoting the Guild. It's great that you are now starting to reference these claims. I fixed the formatting issue for you (See WP:CITE for some guidance) so no problems now. For future reference, format Internet based references like this;
- copy the URL from the website you wish to source.
- open the edit screen on WP and paste into the reference box.
- place an open bracket at the start.
- type the name of the author of the article before the bracket, last name first
- go to the end of the pasted URL, make a space, and title what that reference is, exactly as it appears on the article.
- place a closed bracket and a comma
- say the website publisher's name and add a comma
- add a page number, if the publication has page numbers
- type the date of publication and add a comma
- type "accessed" and give the date in which you accessed the website.
- click "insert"
Job done! We are all in it together so by all means ask any of us if your not sure. Continue with editing and the tremendous work you do for the Guild. Best regards! -- Cassianto (talk) 16:05, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
- I am so grateful for your words of support. Thank you. I am still somewhat overwhelmed by all the codes, so perhaps I ought to run any future entry past you first in the hope you will be able to give me some advice, until I am able to work this system correctly? Well done for all your efforts for Dan Leno. The last time I visited Dan Leno's grave at Lambeth Cemetery in which to help locate the grave of Mark Lupino, it was in a sorry state I am sad to say. The Music Hall Guild let me see one of Dan Leno's top hats which was amazing and also an original etching of the great man that truly captures a moment in time. Thank you again for your support. Take care. Tixienixie (talk) 23:49, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I am very pleased that you have communicated with us. The important issue is not about codes - it's about two non-technical things: First, the information that needs to be included in the references - we need to say the name of the author of the article, the title of the article, the name of the publisher, and the date of publication, and the page number in the publication where the information can be found (if available). We are happy to fix the formatting for you, but you need to give us the information. Second, the information that you add should be encyclopedic - that is, it should be the kind of information that you would expect to find in, for example, the Encyclopedia Brittanica. For more information about what types of information should *not* go in an encyclopedia, see this guideline: WP:NOT. I really suggest that you read this guideline so that you understand why some of the information that you have been trying to add is meeting resistance. I agree that it is a good idea to run new information past Cassianto or any of us, to see if we can assist you. -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:19, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
- I'll do my very best and its comforting to know you'll be there to assist me. Tixienixie (talk) 13:18, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
May 2013
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Music Hall Guild of Great Britain and America may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:55, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
August 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Music Hall Guild of Great Britain and America may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:11, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
October 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nellie Farren may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- was restored by the theatre charity [[The Music Hall Guild of Great Britain and America]]/<ref>[http://www.themusichallguild.com/news "Nellie Farren grave restored"</ref>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:29, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Farren Soutar may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- was restored by the theatre charity [[The Music Hall Guild of Great Britain and America]]/<ref>[http://www.themusichallguild.com/news "Farren Soutar grave restored"</ref>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:33, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 21
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Valerie Lush, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Budgie, Upstairs, Downstairs and Softly Softly. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 1
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Fred Allandale
- added a link pointing to Lyric Theatre
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Austin Rudd
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Austin Rudd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.themusichallguild.com/friends.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 00:43, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted content
[edit]If the content on the pages you mentioned can be released under a free license, that is fine. However, you need to follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials so a release under a Wikipedia-compatible free license can be documented properly. Unless we have proof that the material you use can indeed be used under a free license, we have to assume that we can't use them, so we have to delete them. —Kusma (t·c) 21:00, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 8
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stanley Brett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clapton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Ways to improve Arthur Prince ventriloquist
[edit]Hi, I'm Cotton2. Tixienixie, thanks for creating Arthur Prince ventriloquist!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add 3rd party reliable sources to article. Thanks.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Cotton2 (talk) 17:53, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
- From citing reliable sources "Remember that all articles must satisfy Wikipedia core policies of notability, verifiability and reliable sources. Find a Grave is not considered a reliable source." Please add 3rd party reliable sources to article. Thanks, Cotton2 (talk) 20:48, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Keep writing
[edit]Don't stop writing biographies. Everyone deserves to be remembered. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 01:56, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- It looks like the infobox was deleted before the data was migrated to Wikidata, so I added it in by hand. Arthur Prince --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 14:17, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 16
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Music Hall Guild of Great Britain and America, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jenny Hill. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Tixienixie. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Austin Rudd songsheet.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Austin Rudd songsheet.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:12, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Tixienixie. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Tixienixie. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)