User talk:TitanicFog

Welcome!

Hello, TitanicFog, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 22:39, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

mystic knights and citations

Hey there.

Please read wiki policy for your additions. reliable sources from notable publications are acceptable. got seen to have a non pov as regards this marginally notable theatre troop, and uncited non notable additions will be removed. thank you, SkidMountTubularFrame (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 16:54, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you say that again in non-wiki speak TitanicFog (talk) 17:06, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sure, i got you. in a nutshell, the article can't aggrandize, can't introduce new facts that are not reliably sourced elsewhere, and needs to stay within the scope of an encyclopedia. this rarely happens. for instance, were we to edit, "the performance outside the Wiltern in no way compared to the performances at the Rialto", we would need more than our own attested recollection. shirley, there be better sources. SkidMountTubularFrame (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 03:43, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ok. TitanicFog (talk) 04:01, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Talk:Kyrie Irving. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 00:43, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? Retirement isn't controversial?? Anti-Semitism is WAY more controversial than retirement over disagreement. Not sure what you mean here but I hope to see more elaboration than "Do not ask about adding things on talk pages." TitanicFog (talk) 02:13, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do it right

Please put references in the articles, not in your submission comments. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 05:26, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Should I reference the links next to each members' name? TitanicFog (talk) 05:33, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Every time. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 06:08, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]