User talk:Titan124
|
Your edit to Wikipedia:I WILL SUE YOU IN A COURT OF LAW IN TRENTON, NEW JERSEY -- and Other Bad Jokes and Deleted Nonsense
[edit]Thank you for experimenting with the page Wikipedia:I WILL SUE YOU IN A COURT OF LAW IN TRENTON, NEW JERSEY -- and Other Bad Jokes and Deleted Nonsense on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
It may have a funny name, but you aren't supposed to replace the page with random typing. If you've found someone else's edits that you think belong in bad jokes and other deleted nonsense, please add them to the current list. --tjstrf talk 00:13, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Block
[edit]As a result of your idiotic edits with regards to tonight's episode of the Colbert Report, you have lost your editting priveleges indefintely.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- Titan124 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 76.110.91.110 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Bye
Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Sean William 04:18, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
It was a while ago, and I think the time in question involved me changing a word in an article. I won't deny wrong doing, but I do feel I have contributed enough to Wikipedia and can contribute more in the future. Because of my history of productive editting, I feel I should be forgiven. I also don't understand how the editting warranted an "indefinite" suspension.
Nomination of Dan Marshall for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dan Marshall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Marshall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Skeletor3000 (talk) 19:41, 19 December 2019 (UTC)