User talk:Tisquesusa/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Welcome!

Hello, Tisquesusa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister talk 21:20, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Hunzahúa) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Hunzahúa, Tisquesusa!

Wikipedia editor Oiyarbepsy just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for your article. It would help guys like me to include more context. Most readers won't be familiar with terms like zaque and zipa, and I'm sure these words have modern equivalents. Thank you.

To reply, leave a comment on Oiyarbepsy's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Incomplete AfD

Hello. I noticed that you attempted to file a deletion discussion (on the article Sua (Muyscas)) but did not complete the process. Please note that, when listing an article for deletion, a discussion page needs to be made for other users to discuss whether to keep or delete the article. This is typically done by following the steps listed here. Note that if you are editing as an unregistered user, you cannot create a discussion page. Please consider registering an account or asking another user to help you complete the process at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion. Thank you. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 21:47, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

A well deserved barnstar

		The Latin American Barnstar
		For your good work on Muisca related subjects - including 11 new articles in just two days! - I'm glad to present you with this barnstar. WikiProject Colombia is not very active, but maybe you would like to join WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas? All the best, Sam Sailor Talk! 02:57, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Muisca bitaeniata) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Muisca bitaeniata, Tisquesusa!

Wikipedia editor Pmaccabe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Looks great.

To reply, leave a comment on Pmaccabe's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Ichthyosaurs and Etayoa

Great job with your addition to the list of ichthyosaur type specimens. I was really surprised to see someone already adding to it and even more surprised to see that they did a good job! The only minor tweak I would make would be to remove the comment about the etymology of the name Muiscasaurus because that's about the taxon itself rather than its type specimen.

Your article on Etayoa is off to a good start, but not ready yet to be exhibited on a portal, as it has not been through the WP:DYK program. If you can satisfy the DYK criteria and get a "hook" exhibited on the main page, I'll gladly highlight it in the relevant portals. Thank you for your kind words and interest in my work. Abyssal (talk) 15:59, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Abyssal, yes I thought about that later indeed; it's about the type species/holotypes, not the genus name. Ah yes, the procedures, haha, not really my thing but I understand. It is a bit short as well. Will add more to the Ichtyosaurs when I come across them, cheers! Tisquesusa (talk) 17:05, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Muisca calendar

Would you please mind adding it to the List of calendars? Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:45, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Taganga) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Taganga, Tisquesusa!

Wikipedia editor Garagepunk66 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I really enjoyed reading the new article you wrote about Taganga. You have written an article of very high quality.

To reply, leave a comment on Garagepunk66's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Euryomma (fly)

G'day, I noticed you posted a section in regards to a publication you cannot access. The guys over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request can help you out, just specifically mention which article you need. Burklemore1 (talk) 10:01, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Do as I say, not as I do...

How about you assume good faith, but no... you think you are high and mighty and like to call other people a stupid moron.

Here's something you haven't grasped.... see that box with a number in it, right next to your user name. That is called a notification box. It's useful for all sorts of things, like say one screws up an edit and a person reverts you for not knowing what the hell you are doing. I didn't say a vandal, moron or stupid. I reverted so the person knows something is wrong. I edit in AWB and I could have just deleted the edit that caused problems. But, I went into a web browser and reverted.

The other problem with the edit, is there is no mention of "Rohingya calendar" anywhere on Wikipedia. Guess what? It might be made up because the only mention I can find is to political protest "calendar".

So, next time, don't assume the other person is out to be evil and pontificate on how one should assume good and to get a grip... Say ooops, I made a mistake, not sure why you did this.

Oh, the table is still screwed up... A section header and text just disappeared. Maybe you should get a grip on how to do tables? Bgwhite (talk) 09:05, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Your userpage

You've got a lovely userpage. I am impressed by it. TomStar81 (Talk) 10:53, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Regarding User Rohang Lay

Please assume good faith. That message I added to his page, (beneath the welcome note I also added), was not written by me. It is a template designed by the community, similar to the newer, and less polite Template:Uw-vandalism1. I provide so, so, so many personal notes to users and have a reputation of taking time to give personal attention and guidance to newcomers. You accuse me of having "...no clue about the basics of Wikipedia..." as well as being "...completely entrenched in their own arrogant autistic world..." Please, understand that the newcomer added an external link to his own webpage to an article, and how I responded was completely conventional and considered acceptable by the community. I hope you understand. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:09, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Carl Henrik Langebaek

I have restored the tag you removed. The article is lacking in support. I am not individual pcating the sibject is not notable, only there should be more references. It is really lacking in in-depth secondary support. Thanks. reddogsix (talk) 01:52, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Ridiculous bullshit and you know it. The article has 7 independent references and for an article of this size that is MORE than enough. You give no specifics, no reason, no discussion, nothing. Just harrassing me and my hard work with stupid unjustified tags. Wikipedia is big enough for you to do something constructive. Tisquesusa (talk) 02:07, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Moving back to Andean preceramic

Hi, Tisquesusa! I'm glad you're taking an interest in the Andean archaeology. I've always thought it's fascinating. Keep up the good work. Moving back this page should be no problem. You can just go ahead and do it now. That was a stupid move to rename it, to begin with. I've created that page a while back. Cheers. Eio-cos (talk) 09:12, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Eio-cos, yes, thanks for your support. I am getting into it and indeed it's interesting and a lot of white space to fill still. Have you seen Tequendama, pretty nice I'd say and I will add more in a not-too-distant future... The move was even marked "minor" with no reason given. We'd have to wait until next week when the move request is handled (takes a week it says). Thanks for starting and improving the page, looks good! Cheers, Tisquesusa (talk) 09:17, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Cool. Yes, I've already looked at Tequendama, and you did a great job. While I'm a bit busy in the next few days, I'll see if I can help to improve it further. Eio-cos (talk) 19:08, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Tisquesusa, I'm really impressed with your work. I've done some more editing at Tequendama, but most of what you wrote was already excellent. I just did some minor improvement. This is interesting area, and I'll help some more in the future. Best. PS. Also good that that article was already renamed back. :) Eio-cos (talk) 12:32, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. My activity is centered around looking for external sources and not rely on es:wiki which makes the content more useful. Also intend to link as much source material as possible below in References (news links, single-page content) and Bibliography (books, journals, videos; holders with more pages/minutes of content) with two main advantages; 2) someone interested in expansion of the articles has the sources at hand and add more info from them, 2) everyone can read more/check sources if he/she likes. Thanks for the additions, I think they are good. Maybe a cite-web template for the site you linked to have a consistent lay-out of the name and date, see my latest activity on the -mysterical- Voynich manuscript. Thanks again, we keep working! Tisquesusa (talk) 20:05, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Voynich manuscript is one of those boondoggle subjects that I prefer not to get involved with. Generally, I work in those areas that are mostly neglected, and where there's plenty of authoritative sources and new research. Certainly Andean archaeology is one of those. There are also many such areas in other archaeological fields (for example Mexican pre-Olmec stuff). Finding good sources is easy, and nobody is breathing over your neck. Energy conversion efficiency is high, so that's where I can do the most good.

Those areas where there's a lot of controversy – I'll leave to other folks. :) Cheers. Eio-cos (talk) 09:40, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Carl Henrik Langebaek

Hello, Tisquesusa. You have new messages at Richard3120's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Boyacá, Boyacá

I see that you reverted my edit to the hatnote of Boyacá, Boyacá. When intentionally linking to a disambiguation page, the link should be piped through the (disambiguation) redirect per WP:INTDABLINK. This allows those of us a WP:DPL (and the bots that help us) to know that the link is intentional. -Niceguyedc ^{Go Huskies!} 22:08, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Ok, no problem. If it's more important to link to a <page name> (disambiguation) page that is a redirect than to solve the link to the redirect page which isn't named (disambiguation), I'm fine with it. Other wikis try to prevent to link to redirects as much as possible, here there's a case with two competing forces (link to redirect vs link to disambiguation-named page). If it's to help bots and such, that seems important, so just revert my edit then. Cheers, Tisquesusa (talk) 22:13, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Voynich

You should learn difference between cited bibliography and further literature, and use harvnb for cited bibliography. Méthodes d’analyse du langage crypté: Une contribution à l’étude du manuscrit de Voynich was not cited bibliography even before your edits, so I don't know what do you plan to use it for [citing]...--Obsuser (talk) 22:39, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

There's no need or right to behave like a dick to me and start autistic modes. My history of edits and improvements to the Voynich manuscript do not deserve any condescending, childishly autistic or arrogant mode. Be Constructive and all is fine. I have more than Wikipedia but as my history shows I put a lot of effort in it. Having to move something for a couple of hours is useless. Maybe you can already add some French info from that -Bibliography- source? That is constructive and doesn't need edit wars.

Maybe add some serbian info. You speak a language I know nothing of. Improve and get it to an equal FA status and you have all my support. Spend your lifetime well, so constructive. You only have one. Later, Tisquesusa (talk) 23:55, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

It is not behaving like a di** but editing, discussing, giving advice etc. "Childishly autistic" could be considered a personal attack so you should be more careful when choosing words and talking to others. There's no need to talk about spending one's lifetime (and about personal lives) but only about articles and Wikipedia.

There was no edit warring. I suggested and moved French advised literature from cited bibliography to further reading as it was not cited anywhere. If you cite it somewhere, then include it using harvnb or directly as a reference. Is there anything wrong there? I guess no. There's no "arrogant mode" either, we only edit online encyclopedia.--Obsuser (talk) 22:16, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Wow, thanks for all your dedicated work in improving and organizing Muisca articles! Yuchitown (talk) 05:55, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Content Creativity Barnstar
		The Content Creativity Barnstar is given to Wikipedians in recognition of their work in content submission. --J34jhon (talk) 15:30, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Special:Diff/727570787

You have reintroduced the Multiple names: authors list error into that article. The 'aut' template cannot be used in 'author' fields. You could use 'authors' field that is intended for free formatted names, or dispose of cite templates altogether. --Dcirovic (talk) 21:15, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

The thing is, if there are problems with a certain template, it doesn't help then not using the template. The other way around; it should trigger the developers to solve the problems. If my car doesn't reverse anymore, I also take it to the garage, I don't drive only forward. The aut template is a professional one, showing the authors in capitals to highlight them from the rest of the text. Apparently there are more than 35,000 pages that use it, so it makes sense to solve the problems with CS1... Cheers, Tisquesusa (talk) 19:52, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

You could find further discussion about name formatting here. If by "35,000 pages" you were referring to the current page count of Category:CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list, please note that very few of those pages use custom author name formatting. --Dcirovic (talk) 00:27, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Grovelling apology

Hello, Tisquesusa. You have new messages at Richard3120's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.