User talk:Tiomono

Thank you for experimenting with the page Sandinista National Liberation Front on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Conrad Devonshire ^Talk 20:54, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Contra commandas 1987.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Contra commandas 1987.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:24, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Contra

Hi. This is MarkB2. I am not new to wikipedia. I have been editing and contributing for years. I have been contributing to the Contras article for years. I have seen many editors with an axe to grind and an amazing sense of entitlement like yourself make herculean efforts to impose their point of view on this and other articles. You will find it an unrewarding experience. Many of them also had AMAZING credentials, like having lived in Nicaragua in the eighties for a few years, or having read a book. Nothing is relevant beyond what you can prove, or, better yet, what is well known.

Your interpretations of New York Times articles are truly original. No one is interested in them. If you keep adding them I will keep deleting them. MarkB2^Chat 02:34, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note the signature above, produced by typing four tildes at the end of the entry. That's how we sign our entries at Wikipedia. MarkB2^Chat 02:36, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is that machismo I detect in your latest message? I don't like Scott Ritter. He amuses me. He was also one of the few to assert there were no WMDs in Iraq when it was not popular to do so.

The Catholic Church never really liked the Sandinista government. I'm not aware of deleting anything to that effect. Put it back if you want. I'm amused that when Catholics criticized the Sandinistas they were telling the truth, but when they criticized the Contras they were "leftie" Catholics telling lies.

I read your sources that were available on the internet. Don't bullshit me about facts. What you wrote and what your sources said were so different as to be ridiculous. And please don't go find some book that ran for 3,000 copies that asserts some bullshit and post that as a source. That's what I meant by "what is known."

I don't have any opinions or information worth typing about the current government of Nicaragua. MarkB2^Chat 08:07, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. Honesty, at least. It must be thrilling to write the history of your own movement. Unfortunately the world has a different memory. I couldn't help but notice your other contributions to wikipedia. Similarly imaginative. It must be a feat of will to remember ARDE as successful. Don't forget to sign your comments with four tildes. MarkB2^Chat 20:57, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this user's contributions to the article on the Contras have not only been extremely biased and ideological, but he has also slandered many others for their contributions and comments. He makes several egregious claims repeatedly on the talk page, trivializing the widely documented human rights abuses of the Contras, saying the Contras "didn't kill civilians" as a blanket statement. His attacks on others for being "Ortega propagandists/apologists" are routine. He clearly has an "axe to grind" as MarkB2 user has noted. 96.246.39.61 (talk) 18:48, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think the above anonymous IP address poster is the one with an axe to grind. I think what upsets you is I back up every point with links. No anonymous rants. Your comments are a desparate effort to squelch free speech which is counter to the intent of wikipedia Tiomono (talk) 00:49, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]