User talk:Tinytimm101

Speedy deletion of "10 games"

A page you created, 10 games, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is very short and provides little or no context.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 07:07, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Wii too

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Wii too, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. tgies (talk) 06:21, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Wii too, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. tgies (talk) 06:30, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Halo Smash Brothers

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Halo Smash Brothers, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Clear Hoax

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Riotrocket8676 ^{You gotta problem with that?} 01:31, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Arrowverse. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- Alex^TW 08:08, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I followed procedures. Constantine is indeed part of the Arrowverse.

I was adding correct information and it was changed unnecessarily. I was following all procedures. It was the editors fault, not mine. Tinytimm101 (talk) 11:29, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you disagree, you need to take it to the article's talk page, and gain a WP:CONSENSUS. Discussions have previously been held that have determined that Constantine is not part of the Arrowverse - you need to abide by these previous discussions. -- Alex^TW 11:34, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well you guys are still wrong. Tinytimm101 (talk) 17:41, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough.

While I do still think my point is valid, I now see your point and understand that there is a system in place. I will refrain from editing any further. Tinytimm101 (talk) 11:39, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]