User talk:Tinosa
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tinosa&oldid=258705667
NEW
[edit]Photo sandwiching
[edit]Would you please not continue to have a gallery section at Wardner? As I told you, galleries generally aren't a good idea, and it's definitely not a good idea to remove entire sections of data from the infobox. Nyttend (talk) 16:43, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Recent edits on Remembrances of the Mountain Meadows massacre
[edit]Thank you for contributing to to this article, Tinosa! However, your edit here was reverted.
Wikipedia User:75.169.245.92's edit was not vandalism, as you so indicated. This edit simply made the information you inserted fit into the stylization and organization of this article better. For example in the Monuments & Markers section, every year that a new marker was added we created a new section for that marker, and the year it was constructed was given as the section title (Example: 1859, 1932, 1990, etc.). Your edit created a new section, July 1, 1864, and no new marker was built on this date. Also, many of the abbreviations in the original wording were expanded, as is preferred (Example:Capt. Geo Price was expanded to Captain George F. Price). The user did not remove any pertinent information; just reworded some of it. If you wish to discuss this further I suggest doing so here.
Also, User:75.169.245.92 fixed an error in your original information, which you later undid. You had given the dates for the reconstruction of the cairn as May 24 and 25th, 1863, yet the source for your information clearly states it was on May 24 and 25th, 1864; a difference of one year. If the source is correct, by reverting this user's correction you reintroduced incorrect material into the article. Mangoman88 (talk) 05:54, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
NRHP buildings
[edit]I revised your addition regarding Hailey Masonic Lodge in the Grand Lodge of Idaho article, and added mention of the 2 other Idaho buildings (all of which are covered in List of Masonic buildings). I started the Hailey article not long ago, just as a stub article using just easily available database information. Perhaps you'd be interested in developing it and the other 2? If so, you could follow instructions at wp:NRHPhelp for requesting free copies of the NRHP nomination documents to be mailed to you. Those are good, reliable sources which might also provide material relevant for the Grand Lodge article, too. Hope this helps. --doncram (talk) 16:58, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)