User talk:Tinminer

Welcome!

Hello, Tinminer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Flapdragon 12:14, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Creating articles

Greetings. The above automatically-generated screed includes some links to WP pages which will be of use to you in learning how to create a Wikipedia aticle. Do remember that your work immediately becomes public property, editable by anyone, and as such should not be signed with your username – unlike postings on Talk and User pages. Best wishes Flapdragon 12:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Young

A tag has been placed on Peter young (head teacher), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. The very model of a minor general 11:16, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Hi Tinminer

Thanks for your message. I'm afraid I agree with the speedy deletion tag on Peter young (head teacher) (incidentally you forgot the capital Y for his surname). Fine teacher and man though he was, there were and are many such out there and he does not merit an encyclopaedia article. I doubt there are any Marling teachers that would do, in their capacity as such (as opposed to, say, as Bishop of Truro!). While it's true that an online encyclopaedia nt limited by space as a printed one, it would be absurd if every other individual in the word had an entry. Such creations will tend to get "speedied" as "NN" (non-notable). I suggest the best thing is to read up on what constitutes notability in WP terms, as well as the guidelines on how to write and entry, and concentrate your excellent efforts on creating or improving stuff that will not get deleted. There's plenty out there to do once you start looking!

Best wishes, Flapdragon 11:55, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How about having a go at Peter Ball (clergyman)? Do read those guidelines though (see top of this page), and compare with Michael Ball (clergyman). Another thing to bear in mind is that the tone should be neutral, not approving as it is in Peter young (head teacher). However much you like the subject of the article, it shouldn't sound like an advert. Flapdragon 12:33, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Elicting feedback from other Wikipedians

Greetings Tinminer. Not sure what to suggest -- possibly you could attract more traffic by making sure your pages are linked to from everywhere relevant, as well as all relevant Categories. I wouldn't see the lack of Talk pages as a problem though. Great to see your contributions taking shape on Wikipedia. Do make sure you take the time to apply the normal conventions though (formatting etc). Flapdragon 12:46, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cornwall WikiProject

Hi, good to see a new editor adding to the coverage of Cornwall! Have you found the Cornwall WikiProject yet? DuncanHill 16:23, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have just been there and see you have! DuncanHill 16:24, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you deserve one of these.....

		The Original Barnstar
		for all your hard work on the Media of Cornwall DuncanHill 23:45, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Penwith Wikiproject & Cornwall Wikiproject

Hi, I see you are a member of the Cornwall Wikiproject. A proposal has been made to merge the Penwith Wikiproject into it. You can join in the debate here. Best wishes, DuncanHill (talk) 12:19, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the email

Thanks for the email - much appreciated. You might find my Cornwall Resources useful - let me know if you need anything looked up in any of my books. All the best, DuncanHill (talk) 16:32, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Murdock House, Redruth

Quakers sold Murdock House in 2006 or 2007.

P.S. The article on Gas lighting doesn't mention Redruth.Vernon White ^{. . . Talk} 23:39, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sylvia's Meadow

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sylvia's Meadow, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stifle (talk) 11:19, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed your warning of proposed deletion of Sylvia's Meadow, because you said that it was a 'un-notable field'.

On the contrary, it is a SSSI, and a very rare example of an un-ploughed field. For this reason, it is home to threatened orchid and other wild plant species, making it a very relevant site in terms of the UK's biodiversity.

I have added this information to the article, and placed a note on the article's talk page.

Thanks, Tinminer (talk) 11:36, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article has now been nominated for a discussion as to whether it should be deleted. Please follow the link on the article to contribute to the discussion. Stifle (talk) 11:43, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Preview

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to Sylvia's Meadow, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:19, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Carnmenellis

Hi Tinminer, I've been on Wikipedia for a few years but am a very recent recruit to the Cornwall Project.

One of my interests is Cornish geology and so I'm familiar with the placename Carmmenellis because it gives its name to one of the granite batholiths in Cornwall - see Geology of Cornwall. That interest took me to the article Carnmenellis and looking at the history, I see you started, and did much of the work on, that article.

I have now added some more information and rearranged the article to reflect Carnmenellis as a parish and an area rather just a single location (I've also added coords and an external link). Please have a look - if you have any comments or suggestions, please drop me a line on my talk page. Best wishes, Andy F (talk) 10:57, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again TM, thanks for the note on my talk page - glad to collaborate. I've added a few new articles recently which are listed here.

BTW, that piece about Churchtown Farm nature reserve in your sandbox looks interesting... Best wishes, Andy F (talk) 17:43, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tinminer, if you get a mo...

... could you have a look at this please. Warm regards, Andy F (talk) 22:58, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A brief 'hullo'

Hi Tinminer, this is just a very brief note to let you know I'm back in the fold after an absence from WP. I hope to get stuck into more editing on Cornwall-related articles very soon. Best wishes

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Tinminer! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 329 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Mark Chappell - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:38, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cornish World for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cornish World is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cornish World until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bob Re-born (talk) 22:27, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cornwall wildlife trust

See you contributed a great deal to the site

Please would you consider my suggestions at the following talk page?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cornwall_Wildlife_Trust#Founders

Thanks

Craig.chamberlain11 (talk) 11:37, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Bridges, boats and trains at Saltash..jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:15, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Churchtown Farm Wildlife Reserve, Saltash.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:34, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gasworld

The article Gasworld has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

References were not cleaned up after 5 years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ―Matthew J. Long -Talk-^☖ 19:41, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Inside Cornwall for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inside Cornwall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inside Cornwall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tagishsimon (talk) 06:00, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tinminer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]