User talk:Tinihere
Speedy deletion nomination of Alongsiders International
[edit]Hello Tinihere,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Alongsiders International for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:48, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
September 2017
[edit]
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Alongsiders International. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:50, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
November 2017
[edit]
Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Believers Church Medical College Hospital. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:
|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]
Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:
|image=SomeImage.jpg.
There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:43, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 24
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited J.John, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Minister and Evangelist. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
October 2024
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from J.John. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. I have replaced the "unreliable sources" tag as this still applies: Amazon and the Mirror. Do you know, work for or represent J.John, or are you J.John? Tacyarg (talk) 19:16, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your notes. I am a newbie editor and like to learn more. I know J.John because I like listening to his sermons. I read WP:RSPAMAZON and understand why Amazon might be considered unnecessary (but not unrealiable) source. But why is Daily Mirror considered unrealiable source? Tinihere (talk) 01:46, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hmm, good point. I was lumping the Mirror in with the Mail, as they are both tabloids with similar standards of journalism. But in fact, although the Mail has been WP:DEPRECATED, there is no consensus on the Mirror - see here. Tacyarg (talk) 09:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- So, I guess you are for the unreliability of the Mirror. If the Amazon and Mirror references are deleted, then the tag would can also be deleted from the page, right? Tinihere (talk) 04:19, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- There are a few others. Some look like blogs, others I think are primary sources, some are self-published sources. It's generally not well-sourced, I'd say. Tacyarg (talk) 19:55, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- So, I guess you are for the unreliability of the Mirror. If the Amazon and Mirror references are deleted, then the tag would can also be deleted from the page, right? Tinihere (talk) 04:19, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hmm, good point. I was lumping the Mirror in with the Mail, as they are both tabloids with similar standards of journalism. But in fact, although the Mail has been WP:DEPRECATED, there is no consensus on the Mirror - see here. Tacyarg (talk) 09:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)