User talk:Tinascousin

Welcome

Hello, Tinascousin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you will enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! You can sign your name on talk and voting pages using four tildes, (~~~~), which produces your username, the time, and the date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump, or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! PS: please see http://www.elearnenglishlanguage.com/difficulties/its.html. Please fix the spelling and grammar errors to match Wikipedia's Manual of Style. — getcrunk what?! 16:00, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Doctor Who in Australia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:30, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Doctor Who in Australia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:21, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Doctor Who in Australia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:59, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Doctor Who in Australia may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Doctor Who in Australia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Peter O'Brien and The Invisible Enemy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deep Breath (Doctor Who)

Before removing content, as you did with this edit, please actually check the sources. In this case the statement in question was sourced to this article: Jess Denham (7 July 2014). "Doctor Who series 8: Scripts leak online as BBC begs fans not to spread spoilers". The Independent. Retrieved 10 July 2014. Specifically the fifth paragraph. Thanks. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 15:28, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Doctor Who in Australia

added links pointing to John Lee, The Runaway Bride, The Rescue, The Three Doctors and Doctor Who Prom

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dannii Minogue 'Coconut' Australian chart peak

Hi, I noticed you removed the Australian (ARIA) singles chart peak I added for 'Coconut' on Dannii Minogue discography. This peak is listed in Gavin Ryan's 1988-2010 chart book, and is also evident (albeit in its debut week) on this ARIA chart scan I have uploaded here - http://i.imgur.com/WGKt2Cu.jpg . Please do not remove this peak again, as it is both accurate and verifiable.Nqr9 (talk) 03:10, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I have no idea what happened here because I swear there was no chart peak in the list when I checked, which is why I specifically logged in to *add* the #62 peak. Sorry if I undid something you'd done, but it was certainly not my intention as the Aus peak field for Coconut was, when I checked, populated by a "-". I previewed my edit before saving, which appeared to show the #62 peak now showing in the list, where previously it hadn't been. I was using the same reference in terms of verifying the position, so I don't dispute the fact at all. Apologies again if I undid your good work, but I swear it wasn't visible when I was looking at it the other day.

Sorry, my mistake. Checking earlier versions of the page, I see that you didn't remove it after all. However, it showed as a difference when I compared your edit to the previous one yesterday (unless I made a mistake doing that too), so I thought it was you who changed it.Nqr9 (talk) 22:34, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've found the user who removed it now. Their talk page has a couple of vandalism warnings, which explains it.Nqr9 (talk) 22:37, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Metallica 'Harvester of Sorrow' Australian (ARIA) peak

Hi, I noticed you removed the #100 Australian peak for Metallica's "Harvester of Sorrow" from the Metallica discography page. Someone later reverted your edit to re-instate it, but this peak is correct. Although ARIA unfortunately have never published positions 51-100 from the time they commenced producing the chart in-house in June 1988 to December 1989 inclusive, the Chartifacts column from the ARIA Report sometimes lists peaks outside the top 50 from this period. As it happens, the peak for "Harvester of Sorrow" is listed in the Chartifacts column for the week "Enter Sandman" debuted. I've updated the reference now to a scan of that page of the report, which is uploaded here - http://i.imgur.com/RgaoV1a.png .Nqr9 (talk) 11:29, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tinascousin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tinascousin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tinascousin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]