User talk:TinaLYang

Respect anyone who is worthwhile to be respected in my life.

January 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Shanghai Tower has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Shanghai Tower was changed by TinaLYang (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.886721 on 2018-01-11T03:02:43+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:02, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please check your spelling and grammar, and provide reliable sources

Hi Tina, Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your edits. Please check your grammar and spelling before submitting edits to Wikipedia. I'll give you a chance to fix them. Some examples below:

Second Military Medical University

SMMU was given another name of People's Liberation Army Navy Medical University since June,2017. At the same time, the university increased another hospital, Navy 411 Hospital.

should read:

SMMU has also been called People's Liberation Army Navy Medical University since June 2017. At the same time, the university opened another hospital, known as the Navy 411 Hospital.

Waigaoqiao Power Station

This power station is called "World Class in Clean Coal" power station by Siemens.And it is the cleanest power station in China.

should read:

This power station has been called "World Class in Clean Coal" by Siemens, and is the cleanest power station in China.

These above are just some examples. Please ensure proper grammar and spelling before submitting your edits to Wikipedia.

Reliable sources

I've reverted your edit to Gaoqiao station (Shanghai Metro) because you did not provide a source for the delayed opening. If you do have a source, please add it to the page. In addition, two other notes:

Wikipedia expects reliable sources when citing material. In particular 360doc.com is not a reliable source, as it is simply a content platform where anyone can post content that may appear to be masquerading as news. It is more akin to a blog, and would be questionable as a source if put up to the test. Please provide references to authoritative publications where possible, or your material may be removed. One key test is, if you can yourself add material to that site, it is probably not a good source.
Please don't just copy/paste the url of the source between
```
<ref>...</ref>
```
tags. Provide more detail like the author, date, publication where possible; feel free to use the Template:Cite web template.

Thanks. Heights^{(Want to talk?)} 15:21, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the help, Heights. TinaLYang (talk) 15:34, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]