User talk:Timothymarcc
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Blake Mycoskie, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.change.org/changemakers/view/blake_mycoskie. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:24, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Blake Mycoskie
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Blake Mycoskie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 06:27, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Whisperback
[edit]
Hello. You have a new message at Kudpung's talk page. 00:44, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Timothymarcc. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
January 2018
[edit]
Hello, I'm Corkythehornetfan. I noticed that you recently removed content from UCF Knights football without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Corky 00:11, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm a writer at Sports Illustrated hoping to get in touch with you for a story on the UCF football team. Could you find me on Twitter at @stephapstein? (I'm new to this so not sure I want to post my email address on what appears to be an open page, but happy to DM it to you so we can proceed.) Thank you! Stephaniesi (talk) 16:19, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 2
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of engineering schools, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page School of Engineering and Applied Science (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 17
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael J. Moore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 22
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of pharmacy schools in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gulfport (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
August 2018
[edit] Hello. Your recent edit to Harvard Business School appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Gab4gab (talk) 17:29, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 19
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Carey University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 2
[edit]An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- List of Stanford GSB alumni (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Seagate
- Owen Graduate School of Management (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Bravo
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 9
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Stanford GSB alumni, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seagate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 3
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Carey University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cobbler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 16
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Sephardic Jews, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tunisian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Timothymarcc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
February 2019
[edit] Hello, I'm Bagumba. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of nicknames used in basketball, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 04:38, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on List of nicknames used in basketball. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Bagumba (talk) 06:18, 23 February 2019 (UT
NUMEROUS NAMES ON THAT SITE ARE NOT SOURCED. LEAVE ME ALONE.@Bagumba:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 08:21, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Timothymarcc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Plenty of names on there aren't sourced. Timothymarcc (talk) 17:02, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The solution to garbage is not to add more garbage. No grounds for unblock provided. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 19:03, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Timothymarcc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
It is not garbage since it is true. Why isn't the other "garbage" not removed? Timothymarcc (talk) 21:36, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have been editing here since 2009. I am surprised you are not seemingly aware that "well everything else wasn't sourced" isn't an excuse for adding more unsourced material. In any case, I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 21:48, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Timothymarcc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Yes, I have been editing since 2009, which means I know when something should be sourced and when it makes no sense to have to. I was adding a NICKNAME...a NICKNAME to an NBA player. I did not source it b/c it is silly to have to do. And I saw that MANY, MANY other NICKNAMES were not sourced on the EXACT same page. I do not care about being blocked. What I want to know is why I was reprimanded for something that is ROUTINELY done on the EXACT PAGE I edited. Why was I singled out?Timothymarcc (talk) 7:15 am, Today (UTC+7)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because you still fail to understand why you have been blocked. Note that the article in question is semi-protected precisely in order to avoid such editing. Nobody has singled you out. If our BLP policy was silly, it would not be a policy. This is only a short block, you can sit it out.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:02, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
unblock|reason=Did I not just say I do not care about being blocked? I did not plan on editing anything today anyway. I wanted to know why I was being singled out. There are NUMEROUS NICKNAMES on that EXACT page that are not sourced. How come they are still on there while my edit is removed? What is that policy for that? Why is it that when I do the EXACT SAME thing as someone else on the EXACT same page my edit gets removed and I get blocked? Explain that policyTimothymarcc (talk) 04:33, 24 February 2019 (UTC)}}
July 2019
[edit]
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to List of Jewish American businesspeople. Thank you. Jayjg (talk) 16:15, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 10
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Sephardic Jews, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Israeli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 18
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Sephardic Jews, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Israeli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 31
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of National Basketball Association general managers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page USC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:21, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
March 2020
[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on God Nisanov; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jayjg (talk) 20:34, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |