User talk:Timmyo101

Welcome!

Hello, Timmyo101, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! swinquest (talk) 02:06, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Swardson's place of birth

Hello Timmyo101,

I noticed you entered Minneapolis–Saint Paul as Swardson's place of birth in the infobox in his article and I have reverted your edit. Minneapolis–Saint Paul are actually twin cities and so one can't technically be born in both. There also seems to be some contention as to whether he was born in Minneapolis or Saint Paul. The lack of a reference to Nick Swardson's place of birth in his Wikipedia article is addressed on the article's talk page here.

As per Wikipedia's guidelines regarding biographies of living persons: Contentious material about living persons (or recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion. However, if you can find one or more reliable sources for his city of birth, feel free to add the city's name to both the infobox and body of the article with a citation. If you need help on formatting your citation, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page and I'll help you with what I can.

Cheers! --Marchije•^speak/_peek 00:14, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Karan Brar. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 06:26, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for long term disruption. After months (years?) of IP hopping to evade blocks and continue disruption, I gave you the benefit of the doubt here that you may be able to reign in your disruption and complete disregard for concerns that are raised regarding your editing, however you continue unabated. Nearly every single one of your edits violates the Manual of Style for infoboxes and you continue to violate Wikipedia's policy on verifiability and reliable sourcing. The amount of time it takes others to review each of your edits, clean up, and then explain why your edits are incorrect is overwhelming.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 15:03, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mike Kellogg.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! avs5221^{(talk|contrib)} 11:18, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mike Kellogg concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mike Kellogg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:47, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Mike Kellogg

Hello Timmyo101. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Mike Kellogg.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mike Kellogg}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 23:02, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]