User talk:TimmySmidge

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of TimySmidge (talk • contribs • block log • creation log). As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

Leebo ^T/C 20:22, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TimmySmidge (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this isn't a true sockpuppet, but rather a replacement

Decline reason:

As per below. — Yamla 20:41, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A sockpuppet is an alternate account used in an abusive manner. In this case, you are abusing this account because its purpose is to evade your other block. You've used it to start off-topic chat on the Main Page talk page too. Leebo ^T/C 20:32, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, then I should try to get my orginal user name back. I see, well, check out EVula's talk page. My apology is there. Sorry. --TimySmidge 20:34, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, the appropriate method would be to request to be unblocked on your original account's talk page. Leebo ^T/C 20:37, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, now this Yamla person has declined. Could you unblock TimySmidge? --TimySmidge 20:43, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think unblocking TimySmidge would be appropriate. Leebo ^T/C 20:44, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? I learned my lesson. --TimySmidge 20:45, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have not demonstrated this, and your block was the result of long-term consistent disruption. Leebo ^T/C 20:46, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I promise that if you unblock this, I will go back to my old ways of just editing articles, not talking to users and trying to be an admin. --TimySmidge 20:49, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, this is not the appropriate place to make a case for unblocking your other account. Leebo ^T/C 20:55, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]