User talk:Timlaieditor

December 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Calvin Lo, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Csgir (talk) 04:58, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Timlaieditor. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 19:03, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Timlaieditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am an editor for a local publication here in Taiwan. While my coverage is finance, I have specific interest in uncovering the ultra wealthy among the crowd. While it may seem that I have participated in “sockpuppeting”, I have no knowledge of it and believe it’s purely coincidental that many people here in Asia are interested in profile of Calvin Lo. He is a young and prominent person in Hong Kong and a lot of press is on him. It’s not surprising that many will want to contribute. Regardless, I believe the block on me is no longer necessary. I will make sure to do whatever it takes to disassociate myself from potential sockpuppeters, and I will make productive contributions instead. I just want to emphasise that I am not connected in any way with the others. I also want to appeal not to have the page Suparatana Bencharongkul page deleted. The contributors have gathered some very reliable and useful information on an influential person. Just don’t want to deny the public of such information because of my silly mistakes. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry was established via technical evidence. There's no doubt about the sockpuppetry, so you can't claim you have no knowledge of it. Yamla (talk) 11:51, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Timlaieditor. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 04:16, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]