User talk:Timiabayomi

Welcome!

Hello, Timiabayomi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Darreg (talk) 01:45, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NWFL Champion's Shield

While I weakly agree with you that "NWFL Champions Sheild" is probably a more suitable name, I do not agree that the current name is misleading as Super Cup all over the world refers to league winners vs cup winners. Additionally, the POV and tone of your added edits is not appropraite by Wikipedia stanndards. Also, this is not how to move a page, you need to make a move request or get someone with page-mover rights to do it for you. And thanks for the images :) HandsomeBoy (talk) 08:17, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Usman Abd'Allah) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Usman Abd'Allah.

User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

The article needs some copyediting for tone, and could also do with fewer citations at the ends of sentences (the Coaching career section has some pretty egregious examples: you almost never need 4+ citations to back up a claim). Additionally, I see that you've claimed the photo of the subject as your own work. Please review Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline, and if pertinent, declare any conflicts of interest (or lack thereof) that you may have with the subject on the article's talk page.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:25, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Peter Olawale

The article Peter Olawale has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL, as doesn't seem to have played in a Tier 1 International Match or played in a competitive game between two teams from fully-professional leagues. The NPFL is the only league that meets this criteria in Nigeria.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 17:13, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peter Olawale for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Olawale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Olawale until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HawkAussie (talk) 00:01, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mbachu John Ndubuisi

Hello, Timiabayomi

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mbachu John Ndubuisi for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Govvy (talk) 17:49, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mbachu John Ndubuisi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mbachu John Ndubuisi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mbachu John Ndubuisi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spike 'em (talk) 18:04, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mbachu John moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mbachu John, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 22:40, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of OGBODO UK SPORT

The article OGBODO UK SPORT has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks in-depth sources on the subject. Kindly try to add sources from reliable news websites that discuss the subject extensively.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jamiebuba (talk) 20:49, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of OGBODO UK SPORT for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article OGBODO UK SPORT is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OGBODO UK SPORT until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

– NJD-DE (talk) 20:40, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suleiman 'Slow' Danladi (December 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nagol0929 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Suleiman 'Slow' Danladi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nagol0929 (talk) 13:11, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Timiabayomi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nagol0929 (talk) 13:11, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Suleiman 'Slow' Danladi

Hello, Timiabayomi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Suleiman 'Slow' Danladi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]