User talk:TimeTells

April 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 18:02, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TimeTells (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Because I'm contributing valuable information and resources and not marketing anything. I am trying to get an error changed on wiki. This topic is very important to get right. Please help. I got blocked for asking for assistance?

Decline reason:

You seem to be here to push theories about 'hexagonal water' and not collaborate with others to improve this encyclopedia. I am declining this request. 331dot (talk) 18:11, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That's a wrong perception. I am here to help people discover it because it saves lives, "absent at diseased areas of the body" etc. and boost agricultural production naturally. I am a naturalist, farmer and father that cares about the future. Did you read the section on filtering pollution out at the molecular level with this phenomena for instance? This is prudent technology for a dying world and thousands of people come to the page to learn more only to find a superficially written article that doesn't account for overwhelming professional research from around the globe. I contacted help to get an update for better content and help with editors not willing to learn more before reverting my article again and again, and now am blocked for trying to get this much needed info corrected. Their article is about two paragraphs and does not describe what it is. I am seeking quality here and accuracy and I hope that I will soon find it here at the Wiki organization.— Preceding unsigned comment added by TimeTells (talk • contribs)

"I am here to help people discover it" is just confirmation that you are not here to contribute, but to promote your subject matter. 331dot (talk) 18:40, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My intention was to fix an inaccurate and uneducated article. Many people rely on Wiki articles being accurate. I'd be happy if someone else would write a true article on the subject and I wouldn't have to go through this. I think that most people could easily see that the article I offered is much more comprehensive and helpful in describing what they are searching about and that's why I took the time to write it. Regardless of how poorly I'm being treated thus far here, the fact remains that someone that knows and understands more about it, needs to be the person writing and moderating the topic.

You see it that way, my opinion obviously differs. You are free to make another unblock request and try to convince another administrator that you should be unblocked. 331dot (talk) 20:33, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]