Jump to content

User talk:Time4this

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Fightcorruption (talkcontribsblock logcreation log).  As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Time4this (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am at a university IP address and am not a Sockpuppet. I am aware of colleagues at this university have attempted to make similar edits in relation to recent important developments of public and intellectual interest associated with an individual who has a Wikipedia entry. I asked the Administrator who blocked me to give details as to why the edits I made were disallowed. They were all backed up with references and seemed in keeping with Wikipedia policy. I did not receive an answer but was immediately blocked. This does not seem natural or fair. From my point of view it seems to be an avoidance of my query. The Administrator expressed some frustration at my inexperience at using the talk feature of Wikipedia.

I'd like to be unblocked and I'd like someone in authority to reconsider the rejection of the edits I made or otherwise give me guidance as to the detailed nature of any non-compliance with Wikipedia policy. I may have missed something, but I can't see how my edits were in non-compliance with the rules that were pointed out to me by the Administrator. If my university and I are unblocked I would like a different Administrator to consider any future edits I amy make if this is possible.

Decline reason:

Checkuser evidence is unambiguous. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 16:44, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.