User talk:TimTomTom

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

TimTomTom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

217.237.149.207 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Abusing multiple accounts: Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/NotSarenne (2nd)

Blocking administrator: Rlevse (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Not an autoblock. User directly blocked as sockpuppet. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:35, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TimTomTom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't have multiple accounts and I'm not abusing my account. Look at my edits. I am auto-blocked because my IP address falls in a range currently blocked.

Decline reason:

You are autoblocked because you keep editing this page while directly blocked, as shown in your block log. The evidence presented against you at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/NotSarenne (2nd) would seem to be rather convincing. — Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 22:46, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm not guilty as charged and these are my last words on this. --TimTomTom (talk) 22:53, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]