User talk:TimBRoy

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page List of roller derby leagues has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bmyspace\.com (links: http://www.myspace.com/uticamothertruckers).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of roller derby leagues

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of roller derby leagues. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of roller derby leagues. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:19, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TimBRoy, thanks for voicing your support for the list over at the AfD discussion!

People like Orangemike and DreamGuy are the quintessential Wikipedia bureaucrats. They respond only to quotations of policy and direct, immediate actions. Of course, they won't engage in any actions themselves, except for taggings and deletions. They fancy themselves the saviors of Wikipedia and have no interest in discussing anything, since as mere enforcers of policy they're always "right" and need never actually think about what they're doing or what negative consequences it can have. A lot of the time, I'm sure it works out great for them and for Wikipedia, as there are some topics which benefit from aggressive pruning of article content and articles themselves: cut back the old decay to make way for healthy new growth.

Sometimes, though, it has the opposite effect. What do they really think is going to happen if the list is deleted or even if it's scaled way back, given the caliber of contributions we've been dealing with so far? And what do they think is going to happen in their absence or ours, since they're just alienating us – seriously, you think I'm going to stick around and keep trying to make the best of things? You and I know the list will just build right back up again, but worse than before. If they are successful at getting things pruned/removed and I do decide to stick around, I've half a mind to send these guys a notice about every single edit that comes down the pike and see how they like having to actually take responsibility for the fallout from their deletions.

We have to try not to get baited into arguing over Orangemike's skepticism of the existence of the leagues. He's only speculating that they could be false just to rationalize his nomination of the article for deletion for lack of cited, reliable sources. I don't think he has any genuine skepticism of any one of the leagues, or even any interest in the topic whatsoever. He's only a pathetic bureaucrat, and his mind isn't going to be changed as long as he has a policy to quote and "barnstar" to be "awarded". I think the better strategy is to kill 'em with kindness. Make him look bad by being extremely responsive and welcoming of assistance with constructive improvements from interested parties, people who not only can work within Wikipedia's policies & guidelines but who also can take into account the issues unique to the intersections of sports history, sports historiography, sports journalism, and current popular culture in general, and to roller derby in particular. Make him look even worse by taking immediate steps to address the issues in question, adding citations of reliable sources to some of the leagues, time permitting, even though nobody had any genuine skepticism of any of the info — proving that nomination for deletion was overkill and a waste of people's time.

Anyway… you mentioned derbyroster.com, and I see it's being used as a source already. It's a good list to link to in the external links section (which we're already doing), and it's good that the maintainer accepts & publishes corrections, but it's not really at the level of "reliability" that we need for the purpose of confirming the existence of each league. AFAIK anyone can email and tell her they've got a league starting up, and she'll add it to her list, so it's not much different than a wiki or DMOZ. Newspaper & TV news websites are a little better because there's at least some accountability and presumed fact-checking. Newspapers and books are the best because they get archived. —mjb (talk) 06:12, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Roller Derby WikiProject?

Hi there, I see you do a lot of editing to roller derby-related articles, and am wondering if there is any interest in creating/joining a WikiProject meant to better handle and improve roller derby articles. From looking through the archives, one has yet to be proposed, but think if enough folks were up for it, it could help make the quality of articles more consistent and useful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Echoedmyron (talk • contribs) 19:11, 4 February 2011 (UTC) oops, yes, forgot to sign, duh. Echoedmyron (talk) 19:14, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:39, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Roller Derby Coalition of Leagues

Thanks for the information - I wasn't aware of that. Would be good if they publicised it a bit more! I've updated the information in the articles. Warofdreams talk 09:41, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Ridge Rollergirls WFTDA membership

Thanks for the additional fixes -- these hadn't occurred to me. --Nemonoman (talk) 16:21, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Regionals

I've got no problem with you updating "Regionals" to "Playoffs", as that's the official term, although they are still often called "Regionals". I'm not sure why you say that "Regionals" is not a word, though, as it's clearly listed in the Oxford English Dictionary as "chiefly N. Amer. A regional contest or competition. Chiefly in pl." Warofdreams talk 08:24, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Women's Flat Track Derby Association Apprentice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Namur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, TimBRoy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]