User talk:Tikiwont/Archive 23
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Tikiwont. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 |
The Signpost: 02 April 2012
- Interview: An introduction to movement roles
- Arbitration analysis: Case review: TimidGuy ban appeal
- News and notes: Berlin reforms to movement structures, Wikidata launches with fanfare, and Wikipedia's day of mischief
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
- Featured content: Snakes, misnamed chapels, and emptiness: featured content this week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review in third week, one open case
The Signpost: 09 April 2012
- News and notes: Projects launched in Brazil and the Middle East as advisors sought for funds committee
- WikiProject report: The Land of Steady Habits: WikiProject Connecticut
- Featured content: Assassination, genocide, internment, murder, and crucifixion: the bloodiest of the week
- Arbitration report: Arbitration evidence-limit motions, two open cases
Thank you!
Hi Tikiwont. Thank you for sorting out the Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dr. Naveed IQBAL and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dr. Naveed IQBAL (2nd nomination) fuddle. --Shirt58 (talk) 14:39, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
- No problem. --Tikiwont (talk) 19:46, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 April 2012
- Arbitration analysis: Inside the Arbitration Committee Mailing List
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Facilitator: Silver seren
- Discussion report: The future of pending changes
- WikiProject report: The Butterflies and Moths of WikiProject Lepidoptera
- Featured content: A few good sports: association football, rugby league, and the Olympics vie for medals
The Signpost: 23 April 2012
- Investigative report: Spin doctors spin Jimmy's "bright line"
- WikiProject report: Skeptics and Believers: WikiProject The X-Files
- Featured content: A mirror (or seventeen) on this week's featured content
- Arbitration report: Evidence submissions close in Rich Farmbrough case, vote on proposed decision in R&I Review
- Technology report: Wikimedia Labs: soon to be at the cutting edge of MediaWiki development?
The Signpost: 30 April 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Consultant: Pete Forsyth
- Discussion report: 'ReferenceTooltips' by default
- WikiProject report: The Cartographers of WikiProject Maps
- Featured content: Featured content spreads its wings
- Arbitration report: R&I Review remains in voting, two open cases
The Signpost: 07 May 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Communicator: Phil Gomes
- News and notes: Hong Kong to host Wikimania 2013
- WikiProject report: Say What?: WikiProject Languages
- Featured content: This week at featured content: How much wood would a Wood Duck chuck if a Wood Duck could chuck wood?
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in Rich Farmbrough, two open cases
- Technology report: Search gets faster, GSoC gets more detail and 1.20wmf2 gets deployed
The Signpost: 14 May 2012
- WikiProject report: Welcome to Wikipedia with a cup of tea and all your questions answered - at the Teahouse
- Featured content: Featured content is red hot this week
- Arbitration report: R&I Review closed, Rich Farmbrough near closure
Digital workplace
Thanks for not deleting the content for the digital workplace but I'm still struggling to understand the reasons why it was removed in the first place. Can you please explain so the same mistakes are not made again?
Without access to the content it is going to be very difficult. This virtual workplace is different from the digital workplace in its style of content as well as substance and needs a major/complete re-write. Can you give me access to that content?
Mark — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.173.152.167 (talk) 10:50, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry if i wasn’t clear enough. The actual content is here.[1]. It had been proposed as essay / original research which was contested by redirecting. Then an IP (yours?) reverted the redirect thus restoring the deletion tag and it got deleted, although actually contested. I've restored it but also reinstated the redirect because your draft looks like a converted set a consultant's power point slides to put it bluntly. At this point its there and you can ponder how to proceed, maybe doing some small edits on other articles first to get a better feel for wikipedia and then rework the draft. If you wnat I can also move it somewhere in your user space --Tikiwont (talk) 13:42, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Volvere
Volvere plc http://www.volvere.co.uk/ is a British investment company. The name Volvere (sometimes with an acute accent on the letter) can also refer to a song or a musical group.
On December 9, 2008, you deleted Volvere as db-a7, and someone (not necessarily you) salted it. I didn't create the original article, but after I noticed a redlink to the company's full name Volvere plc in another article, I thought the company might be notable. I found some newspaper articles that talk about a proposed takeover that the company was involved with:
- http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/2919371/NMT-under-pressure-for-board-shake-up.html
- http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/2922199/Kalms-squeezes-into-chair-of-syringe-maker-NMT.html
- http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/2919371/NMT-under-pressure-for-board-shake-up.html
- http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/2833903/Kalms-to-launch-turnaround-fund.html
Special:WhatLinksHere/Volvere_plc lists only one article. Special:WhatLinksHere/Volvere has several links, including some links from spam/COI reports.
Unrelated to this company is an article about the song Volveré (with an acurte accent on the last letter).
Could you restore the original article, perhaps to my userspace, so that I can add the references that I found? Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:39, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
- I did indeed delete the article and then salted it, but it was about a myspace band from greater London. So the article you have in mind would need to be written form scratch. Meanwhile I created a redirect to he song so you can later disambiguate if you see fit. Best, --Tikiwont (talk) 08:23, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
closing a discussion
didn't know closing a discussion was vandalism. HouseMoney1 (talk) 09:19, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
- okay, just tell stange passerby to stop trolling me. HouseMoney1 (talk) 09:24, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
- well i'm trying to enjoy the site as anyone else here is, but it's a shame that there are people that who take these things too personally. HouseMoney1 (talk) 09:31, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 May 2012
- From the editor: New editor-in-chief
- WikiProject report: Trouble in a Galaxy Far, Far Away....
- Featured content: Lemurbaby moves it with Madagascar: Featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: No open arbitration cases pending
- Technology report: On the indestructibility of Wikimedia content
I've reviewed the file, and according to the examples shown here, it seems eligible for copyright, so I replaced the licensing template with {{PD-ineligible-USonly}} and removed {{Keep local}}. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 19:55, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Recent deletions
Why did you delete U.S. Route 46 in New York and U.S. Route 111 in New York? Both roads end at the New York state line (US 111 historically, so I say they are "technically" in NY. Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 20:21, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- They had been tagged by Imzadi1979 as not being in New York but I now see he didn't leave a note for you. It looked to me as if they indeed weren't inside the named states and even if they finish on the stat line, I wouldn't be sure about the usefulness of the redirect. Anyways, we give great leeway for redirects, so I'd restore them, just double check with Imzadi and others from the relevant project on when to have these kind of redirects and let me know. --Tikiwont (talk) 22:05, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 May 2012
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation endorses open-access petition to the White House; pending changes RfC ends
- Recent research: Supporting interlanguage collaboration; detecting reverts; Wikipedia's discourse, semantic and leadership networks, and Google's Knowledge Graph
- WikiProject report: Experts and enthusiasts at WikiProject Geology
- Featured content: Featured content cuts the cheese
- Arbitration report: Fæ and GoodDay requests for arbitration, changes to evidence word limits
- Technology report: Developer divide wrangles; plus Wikimedia Zero, MediaWiki 1.20wmf4, and IPv6
The Signpost: 04 June 2012
- Special report: WikiWomenCamp: From women, for women
- Discussion report: Watching Wikipedia change
- WikiProject report: Views of WikiProject Visual Arts
- Featured content: On the lochs
- Arbitration report: Two motions for procedural reform, three open cases, Rich Farmbrough risks block and ban
- Technology report: Report from the Berlin Hackathon
The Signpost: 11 June 2012
- News and notes: Foundation finance reformers wrestle with CoI
- WikiProject report: Counter-Vandalism Unit
- Featured content: The cake is a pi
- Arbitration report: Procedural reform enacted, Rich Farmbrough blocked, three open cases
The Signpost: 18 June 2012
- Investigative report: Is the requests for adminship process 'broken'?
- News and notes: Ground shifts while chapters dither over new Association
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: The Punks of Wikipedia
- Featured content: Taken with a pinch of "salt"
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, GoodDay case closed
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Weird deletion message: did I do that?
Hey, Tikiwont, I noticed that, when you deleted Daytona (band), it appended some of the content of my user talk page to the deletion rationale. Could you check the deleted page to see if I had somehow attached it to the CSD tag, or was it done by some sort of bug on your end, or what? Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 20:19, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- The full diff is:
{{db-multiple|A7|G12|url={| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Brownie transparent.png|120px]] |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thanks for your endless stream of patience with new editors at the Teahouse, I know it's hard to keep up the friendliness sometimes when they arrive already angry and indignant. It helps so much and it's so nice to see how it turns around. :) [[User:Heatherawalls|heather walls]] ([[User talk:Heatherawalls|talk]]) 18:12, 20 June 2012 (UTC) |}}}
- So it seems you added it somehow. I guess it is due to what seems to be a new template that did link to your page instead f a G12 source. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:36, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- Blargh. Well, at least Heather's brownie is now enshrined in the deletion log for the rest of ever. There was an actual G12 source (I think MadmanBot detected it first, actually), but I can't seem to find it again. Oh well. :P
EDIT: Found it. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 20:44, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
I see this was recreated still without evidence of notability. AfD maybe? Dougweller (talk) 13:56, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 June 2012
- WikiProject report: Summer Sports Series: WikiProject Athletics
- Featured content: A good week for the Williams
- Arbitration report: Three open cases
- Technology report: Second Visual Editor prototype launches