User talk:Tikendra Singh Dhami

COI notice

Hello, Tikendra Singh Dhami. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:06, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Narendra Singh Dhami (December 23)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: A single sentence an article does not make. DO NOT RESUBMIT.

David.moreno72 02:41, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tikendra Singh Dhami! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 02:41, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Everestpedia (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Mz7 (talk) 06:01, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why I get blocked?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tikendra Singh Dhami (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Wikipedia Team.From last 1 hour iam facing some problems with my Wikipedia user page,it's saying my Wikipedia account is blocked and giving the reason because of Sockpuppet of EverestPedia,who even I don't know.I think it's unjustifiable my Wikipedia account getting blocked because of someone else who dont even i know so please Wikipedia team please solve this problem as soon as possible because of this iam having problem with my account and with the articles that I have contributed.And the articles that I have contributed are not fake ,if you think that then you can check reference that I have provided. Tikendra Singh Dhami (talk) 06:28, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You need to explain why you were editing the same article as a sock puppeteer; why you have almost the same name as User:Ram Singh Dhami, who was also editing that article; and why you're all on the same IP range. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:01, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The reason behind same name and IP range

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tikendra Singh Dhami (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello sir Iam here again to explain your questions.. Narendra Singh Dhami is an politician who also represents 'Dhami' caste maybe that's why all Persons who have Dhami caste are trying to create article of Narendra Singh Dhami and iam also one of them who is trying to create article about Narendra Singh Dhami. I assure you that iam not sockpuppet of them and even don't know them and about IP range,thats maybe because of most of we or Dhami's lives at same place. Now I understand why I got blocked so I realized that Wikipedia team is not wrong but also iam not wrong too,I respect Wikipedia policy and also have followed.Now Will you please tell me what should I do to ? In the last I agree that there are similarities between me and other users specially with Dhami's I think that doesn't mean iam their sockpuppet.Iam created article of Narendra Singh Dhami because I would be glad to see someone who is Dhami also have Wikipedia article Tikendra Singh Dhami (talk) 07:31, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 18:38, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock discussion

Well, have you read and heeded WP:COI? It seems to me you have a connection with Narendra Singh Dhami that would make you unable to edit objectively. I'll accept for the sake of argument that you are not coordinating edits with people on the same subject as you have written who share your IP address. We could discuss the possibility of an unblock condition of a topic ban on Narendra Singh Dhami. What other constructive edits might you make to help build the world's largest free-content encyclopedia. Please be aware that this is a check user block and that an ordinary admin cannot unblock you. Please read the WP:GAB for more about that.-- Deep fried okra 11:29, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a closer look. Here are some things I'd like clarified.

Why does the sandbox have a draft on Narendra, not Tikendra, that reads like a WP:AUTO?
Why did/does information on the mayor and the information on the actor (rejected draft) overlap so impossibly? Are the parents of the middle-aged politician and the eponymous 17-year old actor same?
After the draft was rejected, it was restored into the mayor stub, moved to mainspace, and then expanded with information the same as that of the actor draft and/or the sandbox draft of the patriotic teenager (same person?). So, was the plan to change the lead into that of the 17-year-old actor/patriot later on?

Based on what I've seen, I seriously doubt it was done because the editor would be "glad to see someone who is Dhami also have Wikipedia article". Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 12:06, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why article deletion

Iam having problem with my Wikipedia account because of someone else who I even don't know and also the article about Narendra Singh Dhami is now being considered for deletion,it's so bad.I don't know why Wikipedia is considering to delete the article Narendra Singh Dhami' nothing fake is written in the article that you can check through the sources that I have provided,in the sources you can clearly read when Narendra Singh Dhami won the election and become Mayor and where he became mayor so I don't know why the article is being considered for deletion. This is the first time I have tried to contribute Wikipedia but nothing is going good , my user page is blocked,the article writing by me about politician Narendra Singh Dhami is being considered for deletion but most frustrating thing is these all things are happening with my account just because of someone else. Tikendra Singh Dhami (talk) 12:05, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is a common misunderstanding that mere existence merits a Wikipedia article. Wikipeida is an encyclopedia. Subjects of articles must meet notability requirements with content cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking and having significant coverage."-- Deep fried okra 12:32, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]