User talk:Tikbahadur856

May 2019

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tikbahadur856 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had created a page about a person biography where I didn't had used any advertisement and promotion but my page and deleted and unfortunately i get blocked. Could you please provide me a very specific reason why am i getting blocked? I researched alot and read my contents many times but it seems perfect. I have read all the policies of wikipedia and I am aware about it. I hope you will provide me a good reason why my page is deleted? I am here to publish some article which will be helpful for me. Thank you

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request, so I'm procedurally declining your request. Yamla (talk) 16:09, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your username violates WP:USERNAME and your article was, frankly, a mess. Unambiguously violating WP:PROMO with comments like, "was brought up in a decent family", "an ordinary village boy", etc. You also failed to establish WP:NOTE. Finally, you did declare your conflict of interest (great, thanks!), but Wikipedia generally discourages paid editing, mostly because we end up with articles like that. --Yamla (talk) 16:09, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anishluitel439, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Hell in a Bucket (talk) 15:59, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Tikbahadur856 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Tikbahadur856 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I am sorry for what I did. I am here to make some contribution. Previously, the article contained the advertisement which is against wikipedia policy. I have read all the wikipedia policy and I will not repeat my mistakes again.

Decline reason:

I have globally renamed User:Anishluitel439 to User:Tikbahadur856, but I can not accept an unblock request that does not address Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anishluitel439/Archive. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:33, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]