User talk:Tiina Heinonen

Welcome!

Hello, Tiina Heinonen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Roger Wingate, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:55, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Roger Wingate

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Roger Wingate, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:55, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am reluctant to advise you because you are the Group Technology and Marketing Assistant at Curzon Artificial Eye and so have a COI. However the guy has a good given name so … Please read what I think of people who are so idle as to copy their website. To be honest the text was not too spammy but it needs to be re-written - try actually reading some other bios here. There was also a total lack of links to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. The photo was another insult - give us a decent sized image and licence it properly. When you have fixed these matters, re-submit via AfC. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:53, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Roger-Wingate.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Roger-Wingate.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:07, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Williams (film)

The article Williams (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Puff piece for a non-notable upcoming film. While a search is rendered more difficult by the title, coverage is seemingly restricted only to routine matters, rather than the level required by NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 09:19, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Williams (film)

The article Williams (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Entirely unsourced, this article does not assert notability thus fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SpacedFarmer (talk) 12:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]