User talk:Tigrcate

Welcome!

Hi Tigrcate! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! —C.Fred (talk) 19:44, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft does not represent a usable encyclopedic entry. Please review the guide to article creation and the manual of style together with the guide to adding citations. Wikipedia requires in-depth coverage in multiple independent, reliable sources with inline referencing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Tigrcate/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Tigrcate/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 19:45, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tigrcate! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 19:45, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have restored the decline notice at the above sandbox draft, which was presumably removed in error whilst trying to 're-submit' the item, Unfortunately this has had the effect of also removing the re-submission template. If you wish to further submit the item for review please click on the blue button within the decline notice. However, if you were to do so now, the draft would probably be quickly declined. As previousl;y noted it does not represent a usable Wikipedia item. Please read the guide to article creation and the manual of style as linked above. Please add and format references correctly per WP:REFB (as also linked above). Just adding a misplaced link to YouTube (which is not typically accepted as a reliable source) does not assist in establishing notability. Would suggest reading articles on similar topics (or biographical articles generally) to see how they are laid out and structured. Biographical articles cannot be accepted without proper inline sourcing. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk or at the teahouse. Please do not re-submit the page without significant improvement as this takes up the time of other volunteer editors. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 07:53, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding photo albums and YouTube clips does not meet the requirement for reliable sources. Really, we're looking for newspaper and magazine articles about Minke. —C.Fred (talk) 14:34, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Tigrcate/sandbox

Hello, Tigrcate. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Tigrcate/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]