User talk:Tigereconomy

Welcome!

Hello, Tigereconomy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 03:38, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding MEK edit

From the previous 250 edits of the People's Mujahedin of Iran page, 41 have been yours. Most of these edits were met with reverts from other users. I encourage you to stop wasting your time, and other wikipedia users. Please stop attempting to sanitise the MEK page.

In particular, I find your attempt in hiding certain activities of the MEK deplorable: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=People%27s_Mujahedin_of_Iran&diff=prev&oldid=665174241

In the future, please refrain from deleting whole chunks of information.

Thank you,

--BardiaSaeedi (talk) 10:31, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BardiaSaeedi, I appreciate your concern but the page rouses lots of emotions and causes many NPOV violations and poorly sourced additions. I work to try and keep a balance on the page per Wikipedia guidelines. I look forward to working with you in improving the page. Tigereconomy (talk) 16:29, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On a similar note, I've noticed that you have a strong tendency towards removing any information about the MEK assassinating anyone from the article. In fact you once removed information about the most high profile assassination they ever did. Can you please stop doing this? It's blatant POV pushing Brustopher (talk) 10:26, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brustopher, thank you for reaching out. As I noted above, this page rouses lots of emotions and causes many NPOV violations and poorly sourced additions. Because of this, I work to try and keep a balance on the page per Wikipedia guidelines. I look forward to working with you in improving the page.Tigereconomy (talk) 20:49, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at People's Mujahedin of Iran, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. —Pahlevun (talk) 09:57, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pahlevun, engaging in discussion on the Talk Page and responding to other editors feedback is not "disruptive editing". This article has several issues and needs a lot of work, particularly regarding NPOV. By only allowing your own edits to the page and repeatedly reverting other editors contributions because they do not align with your personal views, is disruptive editing and WP:TENDENTIOUS. Please help improve the article by collaborating.Tigereconomy (talk) 16:16, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Tigereconomy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17486 was submitted on Feb 08, 2017 17:25:26. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 17:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]