User talk:TigerShark/Talk Archive 4th April 2006

62.254.0.38

I blocked them for 2 hours, since they're a shared account. Rick K 22:34, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)

Hello. I was image tagging, when I came across image:Hacienda51.jpg. I was unable to determine the copyright status, so I tagged it as "unverified". Could you add a proper image copyright tag to it? Pictures without tags will eventually be deleted. Thanks, Datepalm17 10:58, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Masturbation

Would you care to register an opinon on the Masturbation Talk page as to whether a full color photograph of male masturbation is suitable for that page? Thank you. Force10 22:47, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Response to welcome message

Thanks for the welcome message (to 67.51.137.39), but I'm already registered here as User:Exabyte. I just haven't been logging in lately. A note to avoid confusion: My IP changes almost every day (that's why it looks like I'm new here), so contributions made by this IP in the future are not necessarily by me. Exabyte (talk) 00:03, May 8, 2005 (UTC)

User:Stophidingcontroversy

Thanks for notifying me. He is blocked now.

Shanes 00:56, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Balian of Ibelin

Hi, I notice that you added the "cleanup" notice to Balian of Ibelin - I'm not sure why, but I guess everything always seems clearer to the author :) I've tried to clean it up a bit, and added some sources. Is it better now, or did you have some other concerns with it? Adam Bishop 14:36, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

AMA

Hello, TigerShark, and welcome to the AMA! I think that it's great that you signed up for the AMA (and yes, it's definitely still active). It's entirely up to you whether you add yourself to Wikipedia:AMA_Advocates_accepting_inquiries, and you may add yourself at any time, but you may want to get a little experience first. As for Alex756, I'm uncertain of the extend to which he contributes, but I can tell you that his contributions have been infrequent lately: he may be tied up with matters outside of the 'Pedia. – Clockwork Soul 15:21, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

65.10.37.127

I've given him a warning, which I always do except for the most egregious of vandals. If he doesn't respond, then I'll block him. Rick K 22:38, May 8, 2005 (UTC)

Happy slapping

I thought that the quote from a happy slapper was relevant - sorry you didn't. Intrigue 22:08, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the AMA

That is fine that you've added your info to the AMA members accepting inquiries, just make sure you tell people the extent of your experience here or elsewhere in helping people in these kinds of situations. If you have any questions or want to discuss any issues relating to your work as a advocate best to try to contact me via email, I am just swamped with work outside the wiki realm. — © Alex756 18:54, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't want to have to block so soon, but if he keeps it up it may be necessary. Everyking 00:36, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kagawong aerial.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Kagawong aerial.jpg. Its copyright status is unclear, so it may have to be deleted. Please leave a note on the image page about the source of the image. Thank you. --Admrboltz 4 July 2005 20:32 (UTC)

Hitler and Whiteleys

TigerShark, thanks a lot! You're great! PS As an admirer of London to a London resident, please accept my wishes for peace/calm and recovery...In what part of London do you reside? ~ Dpr 14:14, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Benjamin Wadsworth

Thanks for catching my mistake. I've fixed it.

131.107.0.106 19:16, 18 July 2005 (UTC)Ksnow[reply]

Neal Horsley

Laugh about Neal Horsley man he's one wacky mofo

disambig link fix

Thanks, but be sure when you fix a disambiguation link like on Columbine High School massacre, you don't upper-case it. ("Meanwhile, a police deputy sheriff" was changed to "Meanwhile, a police Deputy Sheriff") Thanks :) --Golbez 19:13, August 26, 2005 (UTC)

Human Rights Servey on Wikipedia (The final post of I_sterbinski)

Dear all,

Wikipedia was recently a subject of intensive research of an huge international human right organization. A team of people from different nationalities and ages were acting on Wikipedia for 20 days, investigating previously noted anomalities of Wikipedia free editing and forming a final report, which (between the others similar reports) will later be a guide to all future moves of the organization concerning Wikipedia. Acting under an account of a real person, their privacy is to be held private. Therefore, very few private information will be revealed.

Also, this is a result of the lack of final possition of the organization concerning Wikipedia and human rights, which was still not formed.

The team's final post on Wikipedia, where they explain their actions can be found on the following addresses:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:I_sterbinski

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Macedonia#Human_Rights_Servey_on_Wikipedia_.28The_final_post_of_I_sterbinski.29

The team would like to thank to all the persons who took part in the correspondence with us.

We also want to appologise for keeping our identity secret for a longer period.

Best regards,

Aleksandar, Biljana, Asparuh, Christos, Valjon, Michael and Ana Luiza

I sterbinski 01:46, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sheela-na-Gig photograph

Hi TigerShark, I translated the English Sheela-na-Gig article into German last week. As I don't have a nice photo of a sheela and don't know much about copyright things I would like to ask you whether I could use the photo you inserted in the English article. That would be very nice. I would of course insert a reference as to it being your property. Best wishes, Netzrack.N 26. September 2005, 9:50 CEST

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Template/Workshop

You, or any Wikipedia user, can contribute your suggestions and comments to the /Workshop page of any active arbitration case. Comments on evidence or proposals can help in understanding the import of evidence and in refining proposals. Proposed principles, findings of fact, or remedies may be listed on /Proposed decision and form part of the final decision. Fred Bauder 19:36, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

IP block

Looks like someone already blocked the nincompoop. :) Thanks for letting me know! - Lucky 6.9 01:46, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Chone Figgins

In this case, the anon was correct. (I know, given his/her/its questionable history, you were right to be suspicious.) --Nlu 03:13, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Test? What test?

--70.104.137.202 20:28, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't a test. I honestly know the information belongs their. --70.104.137.202 20:36, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

62.177.137.37's edits at Tree

Hi TigerShark - just a brief comment, your reverting was correct, but 62.177.137.37's edits weren't vandalism, they were an innocent, though misguided attempt to alphabeticise the interwikis, without realising that e.g. "fi" lists under S for Suomi - MPF 14:30, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Eddie and his suspected socks

Cheers for helping out. I'm on my third revert at User:Lets Go Yankees, so would you mind? NSLE _{(讨论+extra)} 00:43, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

POV "Vandalism"

Please be careful not to label changes "vandalism" unless it's obvious that's what's happening. You reverted my changes to the article death on November 19, and cited POV Vandalism. I had explained my reasons for the changes on the talk page, and none of them had to do with my personal opinions. I had been trying to come to a solution on whether to call abortion "death" that would satisfy most people, regardless of their perspectives. In addition, if we're going to include abortions as death, then I don't see why miscarriages don't also count as death. There was no ill intent, nor was it POV (I'm not an animal-rights activst).

I checked the page Wikipedia Vandalism, and definitely nothing I wrote consisted of vandalism according to the definitions given. Under "What vandalism is not," the worst you could say would be that it was a NPOV violation, or maybe a mildy bold edit, though I don't think it was either.

I don't vandalize articles. Please be more careful before you write anything that sounds like an accusation. I've left the article on death the way you wanted it.24.64.223.203 08:18, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Association of Members' Advocates

Hi, you are recieving this message because you have listed yourself as an active member of WP:AMA. If you aren't currently accepting inquiries for AMA, please de-list yourself from Wikipedia:AMA Advocates accepting inquiries, and consider noting it on the main list of members on WP:AMA. If you are, please consider tending to any new requests that may appear on Wikipedia:AMA_Requests_for_Assistance. We're going to put AMA on wheels. :) (please direct any responses to my talk page) --Phroziac _. o º^{O (♥♥♥♥ chocolate!)} 22:56, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

AMA

Hello, you are receiving this message because your name is on the list of members of the Association of Members' Advocates. There is a poll being held at Wikipedia talk:Association of Members' Advocates for approval of a proposal for the revitalisation of the association. You are eligible to vote and your vote and input are welcome. Izehar 22:31, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

82.3.121.1 Welcome

Thanks, I've just registered now :) --TheMightyMariner 16:12, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters

Any chance I might convince you to rethink your oppose vote? Or anything I can indicate that might help. The RfC that Grue cites is over 8 months ago (and I do not believe I ever acted egregiously on it; at most flippantly)... is that really a good criteria? Something prior to 95% of my WP edits?

Maybe you're right about "over eager". I wasn't even expecting the nomination. But given that I accepted it, I want it to succeed rather than fail. And I guess I must confess to being a little put off by people not only citing a small number of edits from 8-9 months ago, but mischaracterizing them too, as "evidence of misbehavior". I'm not entirely without ego on this. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 01:31, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SheelaNaGig.jpg

Hi! Where did you get this picture? You see, I want to add a description to the image in the article. It reminds me of those at Kilpeck Church. Is this a copy? An original in a museum? Did you take the picture yourself? Shinobu 00:30, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:TigerSharkYesterday.JPG

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:TigerSharkYesterday.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. The same counts for Image:TigerSharkYesterday3.JPG and Image:TigerSharkYesterday2.JPG. Garion96 ^(talk) 00:51, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

For your kind support of my Rfa, which passed. If you should ever have any complaints about my admin actions, please let me know. Also, should you ever need my help with anything, please do not hesitate to ask! Thanks again! All the best Banez 17:06, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AMA Coordinator Election

Dear AMA Member,

You are entitled to vote in the AMA Coordinator election, set to begin at midnight on 3 February 2006. Please see the pages on the election and its candidates and the procedure and policy and cast a vote by e-mail!

Wally 11:36, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Hi TigerShark/Talk Archive 4th April 2006, thanks for participating in my RfA discussion. Unfortunately, my fellow Wikipedians have decided at this time that I am not suitable to take on this additional responsibility, as the RfA failed with a result of 66/27/5 (71.0% support). If you voted in support of my request, thank you! If you decided to oppose me at this time, then I hope that if I do choose to reapply in the future, the effort I will make in the meantime to improve and expand my contributions to Wikipedia may persuade you to reconsider your position. All the best, Proto t c 10:48, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Response at User_talk:Ewlyahoocom#Page_moves

Response at User_talk:Ewlyahoocom#Page_moves Ewlyahoocom 21:02, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. You were quicker with the revert

It's always funny to think that you have reverted it and then notice somebody else's name ;) Dr Debug (Talk) 22:34, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Combs

Well thank you for your message about my 'experimenting', unfortunately it seems you have misunderstood my actions; I was not experimenting or testing anything, I was simply trying to improve the encyclopedia. You see, I thought it was a bit unecessary to have a message on a page titled "Sean Combs" about other uses of the word "Diddy", particularly when "Diddy" has its own page and does not redirect to the "Sean Combs" page. If you don't mind, I would like to reinstate my changes. If you have any other problems feel free to discuss them with me.

You really did it now!!! (you're in trouble)

I'm just joking :-D. I recently started seeing all the vandalism you are reverting. So I thought you deserved this barnstar! KnowledgeOf Self | talk 23:57, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Having seen your revert at Taree, New South Wales, I wish to second KnowledgeOfSelf's expression of thanks. Cheers. Blarneytherinosaur 00:38, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neo-Messiantechnists

Bah. You've beaten me to dozens of reverts, and now you beat me to a revert of my own userpage! Thanks, and keep up the quick reflexs! Kuru ^talk 01:29, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

no really

You got to admit, the fighting your own ghost thing was pretty funny. I wont vandalize anymore but seriously did you laugh.

        - i mean it was no benny hill yet creative nontheless.

--130.108.192.127 22:09, 15 February 2006 (UTC) a yank[reply]

Thanks for saving my page!

I appreciate how you worked to save my user page, I really appreciate it. - User:VanillaX 23:13 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Me too, I've got your back and you've got mine. the wub "?!" 01:20, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciation

I appreciate your work on reverting vandalism! Was going to give you the barnstar above, but was beaten to the punch! Many thanks for your efforts.
One thing, could you move test messages on User:Jones_Matheson_III to the discussion page as opposed to user page?

-- Samir ∙ ^T_C 09:44, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- Thanks! Appreciated! -- Samir ∙ ^T_C 09:46, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Garlic

I'm only just moved Garlic to Allium sativum (scientific name). --Ricardo Carneiro Pires 10:28, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I already left a message on your talk page. Cheers TigerShark 10:30, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Noida

Looks like the content remover did it again. I would block myself but I'm not an admin, so I thought i'd give a head's up. Gershwinrb 12:00, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: Twice. Gershwinrb 12:01, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User page

Thanks for reverting my page. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 19:13, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Authorized

That's User:Luka Jačov. I presume you can compare his list of IPs with the IPs he uses to torment my user page? At least the first one --- 83..... -- ought to match. --VKokielov 23:20, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help!

I'd like to prove that the vandal who attacked me, a little while ago and again today, is Luka Jacov. How do I do it? --VKokielov 23:42, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My user page

Hi there. Just want to say thanks very much for veverting the vandalism on my user page... -- gtdp ^(T)/_(C) 00:52, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage! Dhp1080 02:11, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for reverting vandalism on my user page. The funny thing is that it is my ip address! It was my roomate so I tricked him into believing the wiki cops were after him. I will keep a close watch on him in the future :) Binarypower 21:32, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Thanks for rving the vandalism on my user page. My first hate posting (gosh!). Apparently the user doesn't like people commenting on an AfD. Fan1967 22:08, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Diddo thanks a lot, ive watch listed your userpage to return the favour! Atleast the vandal did include ASCII art. Mike _{(T C)}

01:31, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ya I sorta meant like ASCII art vandalism, not real vandalism you know. Thanks a lot though, I kept bender too haha Mike _{(T C)}

23:50, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Umm.. yeah... about your accusation of vandalism on User:MonkeyCMonkeyDo. Its my page, so its not vandalism. Look at the IP address of User:MonkeyCMonkeyDo you will find it to be the same. Just thought I'd let you know.

What do you think?

Hi. I was wondering if this looked exactly like this from your monitor and/or resolution settings. Feedback would be swell - I may have to redesign my user page if there is a problem. Thanks. And by the way, would you accept an RfA nomination from me? Thanks again.--Jay(Reply) 23:57, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. As you've noticed, I replaced the image with a link - it was getting kind of confusing eh? When you return from your absence, just give me a message and I'll put forth my nomination at that time. Regards, --Jay(Reply) 00:58, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brazil4Linux

I'm am Brazil4Linux, I'm currently blocked and I suppose I can blank my userpage, right? -Brazil4Linux

Yes, I am. See my talk page. No case in Arbitration Comitee was opened and looks like nothing will be made. Wasn't prove that I have sockpuppets. --201.58.133.104 00:14, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Emma Bunton

All I did was put down that Emma Bunton's singles Free Me and Maybe was on the Billboard Hot Dance Music/Club play charts. This website verifies and confirms that the information that I submitted is true. Never did I try to vandalize anything. 131.95.115.201 22:01, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my mistake TigerShark 22:03, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sstrieu

Apparently, my log-in session expired, so I didn't know I got logged off.. It was when I made the change to my user page. -Sstrieu 01:38, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cuba

I made an alert on the first IP, and the second is from the same ISP. Could you watch the page?

TKE 01:43, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa. Don't know why it did that. TKE 01:45, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks a lot for reverting vandalism on my page. СПУТНИК^{ССС Р} 00:57, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What tool(s) do you use?

Tigershark, I noticed today that you get {{test-n}} vandalism warnings onto user talk pages very quickly. I'm interested in learning more about the tools you use to notice, correct and warn users about vandalism.

I'm currently using CryptoDerk's Vandal Fighter and experimenting with popups, but I'm far from a power-user of either.

Thanks! dpotter 02:37, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

I'm leaving this macrophage, a particularly hungry white blood cell on your talk page, I just finished a rewrite of its article and realized they're not so different from administrators, as they keep their surroundings clean, doing away with anything that's not supposed to be there...
Anyway, with that short lecture on cell biology done with, I'd like to thank you for your vote on my RfA, which passed with (49/2/0), I'll do my best to not let you down, and if you see me heading towards a common newbie mistake, please nudge me in the right direction :)

I love the tiger shark on your user page, by the way :D --O bli (Talk)^? 20:38, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AMA

Hello, you are receiving this message because your name is on the list of members of the Association of Members' Advocates. There is a poll being held at Wikipedia talk:Association of Members' Advocates for approval of a proposal for the revitalisation of the association. You are eligible to vote and your vote and input are welcome.Gator (talk) 14:50, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, this IP...

...is for a school in Minnesota, thus I request that all revertions be handled with utmost patience. We have a lot of kids in this school who mess around on the computers and whatever they were doing, on their behalf, I apologize as one of their peers.

If you cannot be leniant, I understand, but please do not ban this IP in total.

-A student at this IP

P

Upper Canada College

Hi, can you please help. One of your Admin, Ground Zero, has outright said that he will refuse to enforce Wiki Verifiability rules on Gbambino. I have proven in the discussion page that Gbambino has made at least 96 statements without any verifiability and Ground Zero refuses to allow anyone to delete these unverified statements. I thought Wiki:Verifiability was one of the 3 cardinal rules around here. Why is this Admin refusing to enforce the rules?

IRC

You might want to join the vandalism irc channel. Follow the steps here, and you should be registered shortly. Thanks. --Jay(Reply) 22:06, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

Master Jay would like to nominate you to be an administrator. Please visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Master Jay to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/TigerShark/Talk Archive 4th April 2006. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.

Go to your RfA subpage, and either accept or decline your nomination. If you decline, be sure to inform your nominator.
After you accept your nomination, make sure to answer the standard questions for all candidates.
Change the time on your RfA page to indicate the current time.
Edit this page and add the following text above the most recent nomination (replacing USERNAME with your name):
{{Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/USERNAME}} ----

Best of luck. --Jay(Reply) 23:01, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question at Your RfA.

FYI, I have added a question to your RfA. If you have time, I'd appreciate an answer. JoshuaZ 05:15, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal

70.26.89.252 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) has been blocked for a period of 24 hours for vandalism. Thank you. Your friendly admin, ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 19:39, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my page. --Nlu (talk) 23:14, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that was a accident

vandalism

Thanks for reverting the "hick" article as I found a spelling error. I was just adding an example of a "stereotypical hick", not intentionally vandalizing the article. (talk)

Image Tagging Image:RockwellPhoto.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:RockwellPhoto.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. feydey 00:44, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Just an FYI. I made your image, Image:TigerSharkYesterday3.JPG, in SVG. You may want to replace the version on your user page, as it looks a little better in my opinion. ;) ~Linuxerist L / T 02:38, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

what experiment are you talking about?

Your RfA

Yes, I have seen your answer, I'm still thinking about it. JoshuaZ 14:41, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the note. No, I hadn't seen the comments since my vote. --Mmounties (Talk)

21:32, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

read the diskussion page from our gang. The pictues are against european law! So they must be removed. --Hhp4 04:15, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: RfA

Tigershark,

Thank you for seeking out of my opinion.

I have re-read your RfA proposal and decided that I will not change my vote.

Tigershark, you are a great editor and vandal fighter. You are an asset to the Wikipedia community. Unfortunately, I cannot support your RfA at this time.

I am not saying that what you are doing is wrong. I am not playing the game of editcountitis, nor I am not marking you down for involvement in the talk space. You are definitely on the right track; all you need is more time.

Continue your excellent work for a few more months, and I will be happy to support your RfA. Just write on my talk page when the time comes.

Thank you, Covington 23:49, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: RfA

Thanks for your message, TigerShark. I gave consideration to what you said but I have also decided to let my vote stand. I basically agree with what Covington says above. And I might add that I really am not in favour of lobbying voters during the process. I personally consider it inappropriate, though I do not hold it against you in any way at all. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 00:34, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA

I read over your message, Jay's message, and the RfA itself, and I am fairly sure now that I was wrong to oppose (and have therefore changed my vote to support). Really, your contributions are fine, and we do need more vandal-fighters. It looks like you'll pass, so enjoy the mop. Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 02:03, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Double vote

Hi Stifle. I just wanted to point out to you that you appear to have voted twice on my RfA, with one support vote and one oppose vote. If you are undecided on which vote to keep, I will be happy to offer a suggestion ;) Cheers TigerShark 21:18, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, fixed it! Stifle 22:18, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very long

Important: This talk page is becoming very long. Please consider archiving.