User talk:Tiger-Man101

USS Arizona

Kindly stop making your improper changes to the USS Arizona article.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:05, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That is not the correct date. Please stop before I am forced to block you. Best, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 17:17, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the "Struck" field refers to when the ship was stricken from the Naval Vessel Register, not when it was sunk. Parsecboy (talk) 17:53, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And the ship wasn't even struck by the Japanese until a week after the date you keep inserting. --Lineagegeek (talk) 22:14, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at USS Arizona (BB-39), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. If your date is correct, please provide a reliable source supporting this. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:28, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at USS Arizona (BB-39) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:28, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Tiger-Man101 reported by User:Joseph2302 (Result: ). Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:37, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop edit warring until a resolution is made in the report above. Thank you. Hair^Talk 17:47, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously stop

Stop changing the date, you're incorrect, and 5 or 6 editors have told you this. Additionally, WP:3RR says you cannot revert more than 3 times in a 24 hours period, you have reverted 9 times. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:48, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at USS Arizona (BB-39). - Happysailor ^(Talk) 17:49, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Parsecboy (talk) 17:51, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tiger-Man101. I noticed that in one of your edit summaries, you said "This is correct because the uss arizona was struck and sunk by the japanese on december 1st 1941 so it is impossible for it to be struck a year later". In fact, it's quite common for a sunken ship to be struck months or sometimes years later as it takes time to determine whether the ship is salvageable. Please look at the official ship's history from Naval History and Heritage Command, in particular this line:

"Placed “in ordinary” at Pearl Harbor on 29 December 1941, Arizona was struck from the Naval Vessel Register on 1 December 1942."

I hope this will help you understand why your edit was reverted repeatedly. In the future, if multiple editors revert a change you tried to make, it would be a good idea to explain your edit on the article's talk page, and/or to respond when others try to discuss it with you. Thank you. Maralia (talk) 18:17, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your block has been extended to a week; if you continue to evade with sock puppets, it will continue to be extended. Please sit out your block and read what has been said here. Parsecboy (talk) 15:06, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]