User talk:Tibullus/Archive 2011

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 04:00, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

National football Supercups (UEFA region)

Please do not create new templates/articles and then redirect existing ones to them, as you did with {{National football Supercups (UEFA region)}}/{{UEFA supercups}}. If you want to move a template, use the move button. If this does not work, you must use the WP:RM process. Cheers, Number 5 7 21:21, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eusebio

I am sorry. I have looked but I can not find his Rhode Island Oceaneers' stats. Mohrflies (talk) 17:43, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Timor-Leste Squad 2004 Tiger Cup

Template:Timor-Leste Squad 2004 Tiger Cup has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Banana Fingers (talk) 14:38, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Academica Coimbra

I have revered you moves to Academica Coimbra – rugby and sister page please see WP:UE as the moves are in dispute if having read Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) you still want to move them the put in a WP:RM request. -- PBS (talk) 06:28, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think that this is the right way to go about this. Instead put in a request to move Coimbra Academic Association and if that is agreed then providing that the sub-pages are considered notable in English, I'll move them to the names you want.

I am going to remove the requests (from the sub pages, to stop everyone wasting their time on this. If on consideration you think that you do not want to follow this course, (putting in a change of name for Coimbra Academic Association) then we will discuss it at Wikipedia talk:Requested moves and if the consensus is against me I'll revert my removal of requested moves on the sub pages. -- PBS (talk) 10:32, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a matter of defying me (things don't work that way around here), it is a matter of consensus and consensus can change. I renamed the subsidiary pages because of the name of the main page. It makes no sense to name them something different from the main page unless there are English language sources to back it up. At the time I made my decision on Coimbra Academic Association and the subsidiary page names the wording of the policy and guidelines favoured that name. In the last three years the policy and guidelines have changed quite a bit and that may no longer be the consensus. So if you put in a page name change for Coimbra Academic Association and it goes through then it would make sense to change the subsidiary pages, unless they are notable enough to be otherwise named in reliable English language sources.

Personally I am not sure that the athletic teams run by a Student Union are notable enough to have their own pages (but that is another issue).

--PBS (talk) 21:12, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have now move the others back. One major reason for not moving them is why translate the sport in the name (eg Andebol to handball) but not the organisation? -- PBS (talk) 21:25, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Create svg logo

posso tentar, sem problemas. a maioria dos logos que eu faco upload sao apenas conversoes de arquivos que ja eram vector, mas em formatos diferentes. posso tentar converter, tenho um programa que faz isso. quanto maior a resolucao mais facil. --Ben Stone 03:36, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

tres perguntas: 1- tu quer esta versao, ou pode ser uma versao simplificada ,com menos detalhes, que tem na net? 2- precisa ter fundo vermelho? 3- esse fundo tem dois tons de vermelho? --Ben Stone 06:06, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

tem urgencia? se tiver uns dias, posso ver maneiras de melhorar a qualidade--Ben Stone 20:36, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wanna knock off the namecalling here?

There was no call for that, dude. Seriously. Caperspark (talk) 20:12, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mundialito de Clubes

If this isn't a one-off tournament, and I hope it isn't (the beach soccer has been exceptional this week), then yes, I can do that.

And BTW, you were right about the Sporting CP. My bad. Self-yellow card. ;-) Caperspark (talk) 20:46, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Have at it. I probably made an error or three along the way.

The goal list cam from the official Mundialito de Clubes site, and even I'm not sure how accurate that is. Maybe there's a few changes to the match reports we might not have known about. We need better match reports for tournaments like this. Relying on the Beach Soccer Worldwide reports is disappointing, to say the least. Caperspark (talk) 21:03, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's Mundialito Finals day

The webcast from beachsoccer.com is up and running, the crowd sounds lively for this, I'm still tired after just waking up (I live in Canada, so that's an easy excuse for me!)... I think we're all set to go!

BTW, my pick is Sporting to win. They got hot at just the right time, plus the return of Madjer was key. Sporting almost didn't make it out of the group stage, but then Madjer returns from injury and look at them now. That's what great sport stories are made of. Caperspark (talk) 11:24, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All things being equal, I would probably agree. Any side with Madjer on it would easily be the favourites. Still, Sporting did very well in the tournament. If they had a healthy Madjer in the first three group stage matches, they would have been virtually unbeatable.

Now, it's on to the CONMEBOL qualifier for the FIFA Beach Soccer World Cup in May, in Rio. Them, plus the CAF qualifier (possibly in July) is all that's left to determine the field for the WC coming this September. Caperspark (talk) 14:25, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to take part in a study

I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to Main Study. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates about 20 minutes. I chose you as a English Wikipedia user who made edits recently through the RecentChange page. Refer to the first page in the online survey form for more information on the study and me.cooldenny (talk) 02:07, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please replace image

The image used in User:Tibullus/brunet seems likely to be deleted. Could you possibly find a replacement? Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 11:40, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FIFA Beach Soccer World Cup

Long time, no talk! And yeah, it's been an amazing tournament! Madjer's on another goal-scoring tear.

I couldn't believe how good Ukraine was, even though they didn't get out of the group stage. This'll be El Salvador's tourney to lose if they somehow beat Russia on Saturday.

Very surprised at how Italy and Switzerland have played. Very disappointing. Caperspark (talk) 18:27, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't think Portugal was tested all that much in the group stage, and their goal differential is a clear indication of that. Senegal is a very tough side, and gave them a whale of a match. And ya, Alan does need to step up his goal-scoring prowess. It was good to see Graça get a goal!

Even Brazil hasn't played like the defending champions they are. They look very beatable. Caperspark (talk) 18:40, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Nigeria WAS winning! It's level again now. I won't be surprised if this match goes to PKs. Caperspark (talk) 18:53, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A commentator from what network? According to his stats, he's never been carded once in the tournament, so he shouldn't be suspended, unless he was referring to another player.

So, the match-up worthy of a final - Brazil v Portugal. Can't wait! Caperspark (talk) 20:16, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think I figured out who probably got suspended. It was Rui Coimbra, when he picked up a yellow card today. That's his second of the tourney. Caperspark (talk) 20:27, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Portugal v Brazil

Always! Given how powerful both teams are, I can see this going to PKs. And yes, I'd like to see Portugal win this. What happened to them in the EBSL Superfinal should give the Portuguese more of an incentive now. Caperspark (talk) 16:07, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

At least Alan scored! :P But ya, there were some chances to score that Portugal should have capitalized on.

So Brazil or Russia... who do you like in the final (and don't say neither of them!) ? Caperspark (talk) 17:39, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd go with Russia as well. I still believe that Brazil is beatable and have not yet played their best in the tournament. Caperspark (talk) 18:03, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Tibullus! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:38, 26 October 2011 (UTC)