User talk:Thymebuf

Colin Ross

Please explain what part of the source demands the use of "probable" and not "possible".

And why does a book by a mere librarian outweigh the lack of police findings? Braintic (talk) 11:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message.

It is not my responsibility to provide source content for you, especially that which is as extensive as referenced here. The published sources are cited and available for your verification.

It is also no part of my business to counter your impressions of police infallibility or the extent of powers you attribute to them. These are your understandings as you have come to know them. I would encourage you, however, to consider more deeply the basis for your impressions and to be open to a broader awareness of Victorian policing practice and history.

As an editor, it is important not to breach Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis, thoughts or opinions in articles; it is also important not to add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable published source. Thymebuf (talk) 05:24, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]