User talk:ThylacineHunter/Colac Otway

Need some friendly advice

@JarrahTree, @Steelkamp, @HoHo3143, @NotOrrio, @Crowsus
As sort of friends whom I had some recent dealings with involving Good Articles, I was wondering if you would be able to provide some feedback on this proposed new layout for Local Government Areas (LGA's) for Victoria on trying to make them GA standard (Original page for comparison: Shire of Colac Otway).
I noticed almost all Victorian LGA's are still either stubs or only have a start rating and there doesn't appear to be any consistency between all 79 of them. I have gone through all and compiled a list of sections that have been used and reworked this to make the section headings for this page. I'm worried that it may become too long if I use the sections after Demographics.

I have included some notes inside pre sections where either an unused section belongs or prevent adding this page to a category while taking note of what categories it should belong to
Logo in infobox - temporally removed as copyright issue on non article page
Elections - not sure about including as there will be lots of them or do I just list the most recent 1 or 2?
Should some be moved to individual towns or to the region where the LGA is located?

eg. Climate is better in a town, Protected areas (national, state, marine) are better in region

Demographics - would like to include Ancestry/Ethnicity but census data is a bit awkward on this and the page is already long
Education
- Schools - maybe move to towns due to number of them, although Tertiary many work better here as there are fewer of them
- Libraries - usually based as 1 or 2 LGA's
Sport and recreation - focus on local based competitions

I hope you can help me with this. Thought I would seek your opinions before progressing too far with this. -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 04:50, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I could also add the 2011 census date to the Demographics section if it was thought needed. -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 04:59, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]