User talk:Thunderton100

December 2020

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mauricio Pochettino, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:56, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. It's just a case of bad timing. Thunderton100 (talk) 00:46, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarize yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. You have done a lot of disruptive editing, and a lot more WP:TRIVIA and WP:FANCRUFT. Stop editing until you learn how the encyclopedia works, including how to make a proposal and gain consensus on a Talk page. In an encyclopedia or any facility you don't own, there is no such thing as just changing major stable content based on your opinion, which you consider to be obvious. That is called WP:OR, original research. Definitely never rename articles. You have wasted the valuable time of several volunteers who reverted a lot of things. Users can be blocked for these things. — Smuckola (talk) 17:09, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! My mistake! Sorry! Thunderton100 (talk) 17:37, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ruud van Nistelrooy, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:39, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. You've never stopped disruptive editing. Almost all edits youve ever done are unencyclopedic and have been reverted. You do original research and dont cite anything. Users can be blocked for this. — Smuckola (talk) 01:21, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not everyone like personal opinions, though. I understand. Thunderton100 (talk) 01:32, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Your "I make stupid decisions but it's not my fault" explanation is an absolutely terrible defense.

Your account is blocked indefinitely. If you want to write a more comprehensive note on how you'll change and edit more appropriately in the future, and how to edit using sources when you add content like you're supposed to, (see WP:REFB), I could consider unblocking. But if that's the bes you've got, editing Wikipedia is not for you at this point in your life. Sergecross73 msg me 13:34, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:AdVenture Ages

Hello, Thunderton100. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:AdVenture Ages, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:30, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]