User talk:ThreeBlindMice

Welcome!

Hello, ThreeBlindMice, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Disambiguation style

I reverted your edit on the Sierra dab page. In general, our style is to use piped links the way you did, so that an article title like Sierra Nevada (Spain) doesn't appear in text. Dab pages, though, are an exception. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)#Piping. The theory is that a reader who sees the full article title will be aided in selecting the right article, which is the purpose of the dab page. JamesMLane t c 10:15, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I must admit that I would have thought that the additional text provided on the disambiguation page would provide the information to allow the reader to select the correct page. However, since I'm new to Wikipedia and am more than happy to learn the rules I'll remember this for the future. Thanks for keeping me on the straight and narrow. ThreeBlindMice 10:20, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think there was a big discussion about this, in which several people took your viewpoint, but the other style was selected. I'm not sure of that because, I confess, I didn't pay much attention to it. There's some value in consistency, though. That's why I change deviations from policy when I notice them. A more common example is the rule that article titles, headings, and subheadings are to be written in sentence case. Many newbies miss that one. JamesMLane t c 10:36, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

I see you visied a bunch of dam articles (Steel Dam, Ashfork-Bainbridge Steel Dam, Redridge Steel Dam). Your cleanups were greatly appreciated! As you may suspect I originated all those... Thanks, and happy editing! No reply necessary but here is fine, I watch pages where I start conversations. ++Lar: t/c 20:17, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just try to do what I can. Interesting articles - it never occurred to me that anybody would build dams out of steel (but then, why not?). ThreeBlindMice 23:42, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Me either, but it must have to Bainbridge, I guess... The funny thing is that I didn't even actually MEAN to write those. I don't even remember why I wrote the first one, Redridge Steel Dam, but it just sort of snowballed from there. That dam type is very rare, so now I want to write about the last US one and be all done. Problem is there isn't much info out there... Cheers again and happy editing! ++Lar: t/c 00:15, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not to make your life any harder (but since you are writing about steel dams it means you are the "expert") but do you know if there are steel dams in other countries? ThreeBlindMice 00:21, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not conclusively. The one book I found and linked to (which I don't have, and have no idea how to acquire, but which I used Google Books to glean info from, good enough since it only had a page or two on the topic and GB lets you see 2 pages in each direction from where the word hits are) was from India. It seemed to *imply* there were some in other countries but never *named* either the countries or the locations. So I don't actually know. I've tried searching a few times but my results were inconclusive... the search term, even with quotes, gives a lot of false positives. The cross section drawings I did (in Visio if you can believe it!) were styled after the ones in that book... ++Lar: t/c 00:32, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Spring celebration / Easter (as your preferences and beliefs dictate)

Here's hoping that if the bunny leaves you any beans they're this kind! ++Lar: t/c 15:08, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the thought. I'm glad that they are virtual jelly beans as I just recently had gum surgery and wouldn't be able to enjoy real ones. Hope you had a pleasant Easter Sunday. ThreeBlindMice 03:44, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PlutonianSystem Footer

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Template:PlutonianSystem Footer, which you proposed for deletion, because the page you proposed for deletion was not an article. If you still feel the page should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to it, as proposed deletion is only for articles. Instead, consider using Wikipedia:Templates for deletion for this page. In some cases, a speedy deletion criterion may apply. Thanks! In this case, I have already nominated the template for deletion at TfD. —C.Fred (talk) 03:10, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing out to me that I was using the wrong tag and for applying the correct one. Now I know for next time. ThreeBlindMice 22:11, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I just wanted to stop by and thank you for updating some of the max-depth variables on a couple of lakes. They are part of WP:LAKES, and your efforts don't go unnoticed. Also, I would like to specifically thank you for including a source for your data (Lake Baikal in particular). Cheers! Em3rald 12:25, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS. If you are interested, we could use editors like you in the Lakes Project ... you are welcome to join the project! Let me know if you have any questions. Em3rald 12:27, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		I hereby award ThreeBlindMice for tireless work on the repettitive task of updating max-depth variables in WP:LAKES project. Thank you for your work! Em3rald 00:51, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Barnstar. ThreeBlindMice 02:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, ThreeBlindMice. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, ThreeBlindMice. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ThreeBlindMice. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]