User talk:Thoughtmonkey
Hi.
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Thoughtmonkey, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Keegan (talk) 19:59, 12 February 2015 (UTC) Thanks.Thoughtmonkey (talk) 11:47, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Thoughtmonkey, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Thoughtmonkey! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Samwalton9 (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 13 February 2015 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Daniel Romanovsky for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Romanovsky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Romanovsky until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. bender235 (talk) 23:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Romanovsky couple interview
[edit]- No point putting it in at the discussion, but it should help you with further material [[1]]. Irondome (talk) 21:52, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks. Thoughtmonkey (talk) 21:53, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Also this listing of active Leningrad Historians, D.R. is mentioned as a historian specialising in the Holocaust on pg 18 of this report of a clandestine journey to the former U.S.S.R. made in 1986. It is in the Brandeis University archive [[2]]. Irondome (talk) 22:26, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- That's quite a story.Thoughtmonkey (talk) 00:35, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- Also this listing of active Leningrad Historians, D.R. is mentioned as a historian specialising in the Holocaust on pg 18 of this report of a clandestine journey to the former U.S.S.R. made in 1986. It is in the Brandeis University archive [[2]]. Irondome (talk) 22:26, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks. Thoughtmonkey (talk) 21:53, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- It seems like WP also functions as a Who's Who for professors.Thoughtmonkey (talk) 19:01, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Invalid alternative account
[edit]About this, you cannot edit here under multiple accounts without disclosing that. Please put the {{Alternative account|username=EXAMPLE|reason=REASON (OPTIONAL)}} tag on the userpages of all of the alternative accounts you are using inlcuding User:Borock. If you do not I will bring an SPI case. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 16:50, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- I will go ahead and do that. I knew about the policy but was just lazy about it.Thoughtmonkey (talk) 18:19, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Question:
[edit]Are you the Thoughtmonkey that lives in my head? (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 17:51, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hmmm...maybe.Thoughtmonkey (talk) 17:59, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Mine is named Hank. Jytdog (talk) 20:49, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Jytdog: Does he sell propane and propane accessories? (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 11:02, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- I am so uncool I had to google that King of the Hill reference. Nope. That is really his name. Jytdog (talk) 11:03, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Jytdog: Does he sell propane and propane accessories? (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 11:02, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- Mine is named Hank. Jytdog (talk) 20:49, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hmmm...maybe.Thoughtmonkey (talk) 17:59, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 3
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cult, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Element. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Thoughtmonkey. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
December 2016
[edit]This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Katietalk 20:06, 30 December 2016 (UTC) |