User talk:ThoughtInspiring

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bloomberg Aptitude Test.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! RadioFan (talk) 20:54, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bloomberg Aptitude Test.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 (talk) 21:45, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ThoughtInspiring, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi ThoughtInspiring! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bloomberg Aptitude Test for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bloomberg Aptitude Test is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloomberg Aptitude Test until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dusti^*poke* 04:01, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloomberg Aptitude Test, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 12:24, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BloombergInstitute. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:56, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is just to clear up the concerns once and for all over whether or not you are the same user. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:56, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your claim that you're not the same editor has been proven false (I suggest you read WP:DUCK). While there's no policy violation per se, the fact remains the article was created to be promotional in nature. The promotional prose will be removed, and the conversation will now turn as to whether it should be merged into a principal article. Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 07:15, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I challenge this claim of yours. I simply copied the original posters format, because I had heard of this exam before and thought it too notable to be deleted. When I created this page, I used the original as a basis for the initial post of which I believe can be worked on by removing promotional jargon. To use that as the only basis as to accuse me of being a sock puppet is not enough to pull the duck clause. If you read WP:DUCK, you will realize that it only applies in the most obvious areas where a persons IP address, and immediate return to discussion with the exact same ideas should imply puppetry. I am in no way promoting this page nor am I editing in in any way that favors the promotion of any product. ThoughtInspiring (talk) 01:30, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're forgetting something - the page was deleted. How could you have had access to copy and paste an exact replica of a deleted page? The fact that you are the sock of said user doesn't mean much, but it supports my claim of self promotion. I don't care, to be honest. If the page is brought up to wiki standards, that's great - let's keep it. ;) Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 00:11, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And also, you might want to re-read WP:DUCK, I don't believe you got the jist of it ;) Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 00:13, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, what? When did I say I copied the page after it was deleted? I saw it when it was still up and copied it while it was up for a speedy delete so that I may use the template. I'm still relatively new to editing wikipedia as you can see, so I needed somewhere to start. Anyway, I don't think you quite understand what WP:DUCK is. Do reread it and stop applying it whenever you want, wherever you want, simply to pick on the new people. You need to take it upon good faith to not keep jumping to conclusions, as you have been doing. Thanks.ThoughtInspiring (talk) 02:08, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You don't quite get it, but that's fine :) Good luck :) Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 02:14, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bloomberg Aptitude Test for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bloomberg Aptitude Test is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloomberg Aptitude Test (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

FeralOink (talk) 20:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]