User talk:Thony-Ferro

Welcome!

Hello, Thony-Ferro, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Beeblebrox (talk) 20:27, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Help:Master Dy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Help:Master Dy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:43, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Thony-Ferro. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Master Dy, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:51, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Master Dy (October 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

metal-archives is not a reliable source. Some of the sources do not link to an actual article. For example, Rocktopia. I searched the site and did not find anything for "Master Dy". Either way, it does not appear they meet the notability guidelines for WP:NMUSIC.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Master Dy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Master Dy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 18:18, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thony-Ferro! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 18:18, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Master Dy (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hi.

I'm sorry, but the sourcing here helps the subject meet our general notability guidelines. The sources presented are mainly primary sources or passing mentions. Or they’re from unreliable sources (Master Dy, Bandcamp, Metal Kingdom) or non-notable news sources/blogs/zines.

We need *significant* coverage in notable media outlets or by notable publishers. Examples: magazine and newspaper reviews and features about Master Dy specifically; books or white papers written ABOUT Master Dy; television and radio features ABOUT Master Dy. Please review: WP:NMUSIC for notability guidelines.

If those are available, please improve this submission. If not, then it appears to be WP:TOOSOON for Master Dy to have a Wikipedia article.

I hope you will consider improving existing Wikipedia content about other subjects of interest!

If you have any questions please ask them at WP:TEAHOUSE.

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Master Dy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Master Dy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 20:46, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I won't give up, because I think it's a bit unfair that you have articles posted from bands like Alia Tempora who have even less material posted and it's there! but I'm a new editor, only a year around here so don't take me too seriously but sold articles are easily accepted, it's unfortunate. And don't think I'm saying this to you ok, I'm just stating a fact. I'm about to do some work around smaller bands that really deserve a spotlight, this one won't be the last one and I'll always stand against articles that clearly show they've been bought! Thony-Ferro (talk) 21:01, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dinnamarque

Hello, Thony-Ferro. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dinnamarque, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:14, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Firefly, thanks so much for letting me know, I'll keep working on it, hope your week is going well,

Regards, Tony. Thony-Ferro (talk) 17:53, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dinnamarque

Hello, Thony-Ferro. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Dinnamarque".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 17:08, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dinnamarque

Hello, Thony-Ferro. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Dinnamarque".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:26, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:DyMM P&M

Hello, Thony-Ferro. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:DyMM P&M, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Master Dy (October 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Master Dy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 10:49, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:DyMM P&M

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:DyMM P&M, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:14, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello Thony-Ferro. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:DyMM P&M, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Thony-Ferro. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Thony-Ferro|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:14, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Today I received the unfortunate message that my draft about the record label DyMM P&M was deleted, lately I've been studying a lot at college and I didn't have time to edit it but the draft is legitimate, I don't get paid anything for what I write and I couldn't even do it considering that I don't have the power to publish anything, I'm just training on Wikipedia because I want to be a great contributor in the future, but if my articles are deleted there's no way for me to grow in the community, I'm studying journalism in Brazil and being on Wikipedia helped me in college, I hope you understand and revoke the removal, thank you. Thony-Ferro (talk) 19:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Spiderone won't have seen the message above unless you link to his username, as I have done, in a signed message. I saw that you posted a message on my user page and then removed it. Do you want any feedback on the deletion, or not? I should say, incidentally, that if you write about new bands they must still satisfy the music notability guidelines Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

From what I remember, the article was full of puffery and not at all in line with WP:NPOV. I would strongly oppose restoring. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you everyone for the tips, I will pay more attention when creating new articles, so as not to break any rules, as I said my objective here is to create articles for people who are notable in their regions and deserve to have their story told but no one has yet been willing to do so, thank you again for your dedication to the healthy growth of the community. Thony-Ferro (talk) 11:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:EgOccultism

Hello, Thony-Ferro. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:EgOccultism, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the reminder, I will take action, Thony-Ferro (talk) 15:58, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]