Jump to content

User talk:Thomascatterall

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Thomascatterall. You have new messages at NickBushell's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Welcome to Wikipedia

[edit]
Hello Thomascatterall, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...


Titodutta

Thomascatterall, good luck, and have fun. --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 13:30, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Question In Teahouse

[edit]

A new answer has been posted Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions#Beginner_tips. Thanks! --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 13:31, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Found a book about Kimberly Young, not written by her.

http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=hdMAnL5neAAC&pg=PA333&dq=Kimberly+Young&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ku5dT9e_O4es0QWdn5XODQ&ved=0CEYQ6AEwAzgU#v=onepage&q=Kimberly%20Young&f=false --Thomascatterall (talk) 12:41, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No,you need to give verification for each and every entry. But, since encyclopedic entries should be verifiable try to provide as much citation as possible. In the article, you have not given any biographical information. If you have any you can add there! If you have any question, you can ask in my talk page! I have added the article in my watchlist too--Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 18:15, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Kimberly Young.jpeg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://netaddictionrecovery.blogspot.com/. As a copyright violation, File:Kimberly Young.jpeg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Kimberly Young.jpeg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:12, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. I see the image has now been deleted. --Thomascatterall (talk) 11:12, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Thomascatterall. You have new messages at ToniSant's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

KImberly Young Talk

[edit]

Hey, I can see you faced some problem with copyright of KImberly Young image. I can help there, I think. Anyway, you can have a look here. For quicker response please leave a message in my talk page. I am little bit busy these days. --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 06:13, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Writing style

[edit]

Hi mate, a couple of people have mentioned that our page reads too much like a list or CV for Kimberly Young. This morning we should change it so that the Works sections are separated and mention her most notable works in a paragraph instead of a list. Should look cleaner and make wikipedians happier. --NickBushell (talk) 11:10, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think this would be beneficial to the page, after all we are new to this Wikipedia world. --Thomascatterall (talk) 11:23, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host, 16:08, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Message sent with Global message delivery.

Completed the survey, thanks for being so welcoming at the Tea House! --Thomascatterall (talk) 18:03, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Presentation

[edit]

We're marked on:

  • Content: quality of research and writing. - basically what remains of our page at the time of the presentation and amount we added.
  • Understanding: demonstrating what needs to be done with/to the content on Wikipedia.
  • Engagement: level of engagement with other Wikipedians
  • Presentation quality.

Things to include - Screenshots, discussions, editing and formatting content, code, tea house, talk pages - tito - banaticus - Smartse etc, classmate interaction, research difficulties, research breakthroughs, deletionists, inclusionists, image copyright trouble - emailing Kimberly Young's friend/colleague, invited to the tea house and asked to rate it.

--NickBushell (talk) 18:04, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A pie for you!

[edit]
Hi Tom! I just wanted to drop by from the Teahouse and bring you a fresh wiki-pie and say hi! How is your Wikipedia experience going? See you around! Sarah (talk) 21:33, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]